Teams

Harkey, Robin

2026 Tri-Level 40 & Over-JXN · Women 3.5, 4.0, 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-10vs Davis, LaureeLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Loveless / Lisa Shaw vs Dallas Clearman / Kathleen Morgan4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie Eaton / Margie van Meter vs Susan Jackson / Mary Taylor6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElissa Woodruff / Rachel Spivey vs Lisa Tew / Diane Barber4-6, 3-6
2026-08-04vs Davis, LaureeLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Loveless / Lisa Shaw vs Temple Waddell-Callahan / Kathleen Morgan5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarrie Eaton / Melanie Lauderdale vs Nancy Thompson / Susan Jackson4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMargaret Wadsworth / Kelli Ferrell vs Byron Edgecombe / Lisa Tew3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-09vs Rector, StacieLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Shaw / Kelly Loveless vs Anna Fiser / Tracy Mason4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Lauderdale / September Moore vs Daphne Bilbrew / Jennifer Otto1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMallie Earl / Rachel Spivey vs Lori Williams / Amanda Galey2-6, 6-7
2026-06-25vs MacPherson, ElizabethLost 02
L#1 DoublesMargie van Meter / Kelly Loveless vs Kimberly Harrell / Dawn Farthing1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChandy Lee / Melanie Lauderdale vs Joey Sessums / Juli Johnson0-6, 3-6
2026-06-11vs Rector, StacieWon 30
W#1 DoublesGinny Dehart / Lisa Shaw vs Stacie Rector / Tracy Mason6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChandy Lee / Melanie Lauderdale vs Jennifer Otto / Ellen Warren7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElissa Woodruff / Mallie Earl vs Melanie McLeod / Lori Williams6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-04vs MacPherson, ElizabethLost 12
L#1 DoublesGinny Dehart / Chandy Lee vs Kimberly Harrell / Dawn Farthing0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMargie van Meter / September Moore vs Lara Martin / Miao Zhao3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMallie Earl / Margaret Wadsworth vs Elizabeth MacPherson / Shannon Pool6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-21vs Rector, StacieLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Loveless / September Moore vs Anna Fiser / Miles Munn0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarrie Eaton / Melanie Lauderdale vs Ellen Warren / Jennifer Otto2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Spivey / Elissa Woodruff vs Lisa Little / Lori Williams6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-14vs MacPherson, ElizabethLost 03
L#1 DoublesGinny Dehart / Lisa Shaw vs Kimberly Harrell / Dawn Farthing0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Harkey / Carrie Eaton vs Lara Martin / Miao Zhao1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMallie Earl / Margaret Wadsworth vs Elizabeth MacPherson / Shannon Pool4-6, 3-6
2026-05-07vs Davis, LaureeLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Loveless / Lisa Shaw vs Temple Waddell-Callahan / Kathleen Morgan2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElissa Woodruff / Melanie Lauderdale vs Angie DeLeon / Mary Taylor4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKelli Ferrell / Rhonda Rhoden vs Lisa Tew / Diane Barber3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 3.5, 4.0, 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MacPherson, Elizabeth8121616181
2Rector, Stacie54131432240
3Davis, Lauree45131430251
4Harkey, Robin1872045295

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Ginny Dehart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Carrie Eaton
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.38
Robin Harkey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
September Moore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Margaret Wadsworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Kelli Ferrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Chandy Lee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.27
Melanie Lauderdale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Rachel Spivey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Margie van Meter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Elissa Woodruff
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Kelly Loveless
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Mallie Earl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rhonda Rhoden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mallie Earl + Rachel Spivey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ginny Dehart
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.58
4
Carrie Eaton
21W–18L career · 9 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.40
Robin Harkey
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
September Moore
12W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
Margaret Wadsworth
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Kelli Ferrell
21W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
4
Chandy Lee
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.29
Melanie Lauderdale
7W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Rachel Spivey
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Margie van Meter
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Elissa Woodruff
18W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Kelly Loveless
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Mallie Earl
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Rhonda Rhoden
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.