Teams

OC LLW FVTC - Mina

2023 OC Fall Team Singles · OC 4.0W

9 players · average NTRP 4.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-19vs OC CMTC - Tricia - Sun11Won 20
W#2 SinglesMina Whitlock vs Trisha Coy6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRisa Chung vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMina Whitlock vs Leona Tohill6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesHye Jin Robertson vs Cynthia Turner6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHatien Nguyen vs Viviana Kim6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesTheresa Jeong vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesRisa Chung vs Deann McCormick5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesHatien Nguyen vs Viviana Kim6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesHye Jin Robertson vs Sabrina Wedge6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHye Jin Robertson vs Cathy Sejansky6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesTheresa Jeong vs Cynthia Turner7-5, 6-1
2023-09-17vs OC DHTC - Dara Sun1Won 10
W#2 SinglesMina Whitlock vs Dara Luangpraseut6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Mina Whitlock
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Hye Jin Robertson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.02
Theresa Jeong
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Risa Chung
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
4.00
Rachel Tran
published
3.91
Megan Osborn
published
3.84
Hatien Nguyen
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.79
Randi Lloyd
published
Talia Goldstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hye Jin Robertson + Mina Whitlock6653% games+0.6% vs expected
Mina Whitlock + Theresa Jeong4162% gamesnot enough data
Hye Jin Robertson + Risa Chung224 matchesnot enough data
Hye Jin Robertson + Theresa Jeong134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Mina Whitlock
121W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Hye Jin Robertson
160W–80L career · 3 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Theresa Jeong
83W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Risa Chung
157W–89L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
4.00
Rachel Tran
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
4.00
Megan Osborn
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Hatien Nguyen
130W–95L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
Randi Lloyd
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
Talia Goldstein
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.