Teams

Apex:SpringForward:Wooden

2023 ME Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women South

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-10vs Apex:SmashQueens:MorongWon 41
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bowring / Carol Lambert vs Kimberly Kelly-Brewster / Sarah Holland3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMartha Elbaum vs Kerri Stump6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Brown / Lori Thayer vs Kristie Rabasca / Dawn Morong6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCindy Rowland vs Kimberly Nappi6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Steinman / Linda Iselborn vs Pamela Elwell / Ruth Crosby7-5, 6-4
2023-06-04vs Apex:SmashQueens:MorongWon 31
W#1 DoublesCarol Lambert / Leah Sommer vs Kerri Stump / Pamela Elwell4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Bowring / Carol Epstein vs Carrie Lewis / Sarah Scott7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMartha Elbaum vs Andrea Otis-Higgins6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLori Thayer / Cindy Rowland vs Ruth Crosby / Emily Smith6-2, 6-2
2023-06-04vs MP:ServesUp:LedwidgeWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnne Geissinger / Christiane Villedrouin vs Katherine Coppens / Erin Kenyon7-6, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMarissa Bodnar vs Wendy Greenbaum6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Wooden / Linda Iselborn vs Lisa Ledwidge / Jennifer Blanchette2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJenna Ashburn / Kathy Brown vs Marie Sheffield / Heather Krausse0-6, 4-6
2023-05-20vs MP:ServesUp:LedwidgeWon 50
W#1 DoublesAnne Geissinger / Christiane Villedrouin vs Deirdre Barton / Amy Kerr6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMarissa Bodnar vs Darcee Pantaz6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarol Lambert / Sarah Dillon vs Alexis Gillespie / Heather Krausse6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLori Thayer vs Wendy Greenbaum6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCaroline Hartnett / Kathy Brown vs Gri Font-Mason / Jane Tuttle6-2, 6-1
2023-05-20vs WOOD:WildAces18:YoonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bowring / Sarah Dillon vs Regina Morton / Krystal Talbot6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCindy Rowland vs Joanna Pond6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Steinman / Carol Epstein vs Kimberly Oconnell / Trisha Russo-Bagdasarian1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJenna Ashburn / Leah Sommer vs Deb Paszyc / Ruth Matt6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2023-05-06vs WOOD:WildAces18:YoonWon 32
L#1 DoublesCarol Lambert / Martha Elbaum vs Joanna Pond / Regina Yoon3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMarissa Bodnar vs Donna Kim6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Wooden / Leah Sommer vs Karen Fendler / Danielle Dignan6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSarah Dillon vs Karen Eberhardt6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJenna Ashburn / Caroline Hartnett vs Brittany Gray / Kimberly Oconnell5-7, 3-6
2023-05-06vs MP:ServesUp:LedwidgeWon 31
L#1 DoublesCarol Epstein / Anne Geissinger vs Jennifer Blanchette / Gri Font-Mason1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Wooden / Christiane Villedrouin vs Charlotte Pease / Lisa Ledwidge6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCindy Rowland vs Jane Tuttle6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJenna Ashburn / Lori Thayer vs Wendy Greenbaum / Erin Kenyon6-2, 7-5
2023-04-29vs WOOD:WildAces18:YoonWon 31
L#1 DoublesCarol Lambert / Carol Epstein vs Karen Eberhardt / Joanna Pond1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJulie Wooden / Cindy Rowland vs Brittany Gray / Heather Veitch6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSarah Dillon vs Karen Fendler6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJenna Ashburn / Leah Sommer vs Dorothy Zirkle / Kristie Green3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-29vs Apex:SmashQueens:MorongWon 31
L#1 DoublesCarol Epstein / Leah Sommer vs Kimberly Kelly-Brewster / Pamela Elwell7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMarissa Bodnar vs Kerri Stump6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Wooden / Kathy Brown vs Kristie Rabasca / Dawn Morong6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLori Thayer / Jenna Ashburn vs Carrie Lewis / Ruth Crosby6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Women South
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Apex:SpringForward:Wooden81341132323
2WOOD:WildAces18:Yoon72321333342
3MP:ServesUp:Ledwidge18133266467

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Leah Sommer
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
3.57
Martha Elbaum
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.43
Caroline Hartnett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Susan Steinman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Marissa Bodnar
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.32
Linda Iselborn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Christiane Villedrouin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Anne Geissinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Sarah Dillon
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.18
Cindy Rowland
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Carol Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Lori Thayer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.10
Julie Wooden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Carol Epstein
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Jenna Ashburn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Bowring
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Kathy Brown
published
Mary Becker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Lambert + Carol Epstein4552% games+6.1% vs expected
Anne Geissinger + Christiane Villedrouin4462% games+5.6% vs expected
Carol Epstein + Susan Steinman191156% games+4.0% vs expected
Julie Wooden + Susan Steinman27463% games+3.3% vs expected
Susan Steinman + Christiane Villedrouin9264% games−1.4% vs expected
Julie Wooden + Cindy Rowland5256% games−6.4% vs expected
Martha Elbaum + Lori Thayer6167% gamesnot enough data
Carol Epstein + Lori Thayer5257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah Sommer
147W–66L career · 13 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
4.16
Martha Elbaum
152W–81L career · 6 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Caroline Hartnett
21W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Susan Steinman
96W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.36
Marissa Bodnar
40W–43L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
Linda Iselborn
64W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Christiane Villedrouin
77W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Anne Geissinger
21W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
Sarah Dillon
37W–21L career · 9 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Cindy Rowland
39W–26L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Carol Lambert
113W–127L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Lori Thayer
85W–115L career · 5 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
Julie Wooden
89W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Carol Epstein
69W–61L career · type S · 5 lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.89
Jenna Ashburn
32W–30L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Bowring
80W–101L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Brown
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Becker
25W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.