Teams

EW-PC-Khounnala

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 MEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-02-22vs YTC-Lob & Pony ShowWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Denney / Rick Moser vs Donovan Jedel / Phillip Romer7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNathan Burt vs Seth Robins6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrian Wurdeman / Rogelio Espinoza vs Frank Sinek / Daniel Snyder5-7, 3-6
2026-02-21vs YTC-Lob & Pony ShowWon 21
W#1 DoublesRick Moser / Nathan Burt vs Fred Wells / Seth Robins6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesChris Denney vs Jake Bradshaw2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRogelio Espinoza / Christopher Ramirez vs Frank Sinek / Daniel Snyder6-4, 6-2
2026-02-21vs EW-CBRC-SathLost 12
L#1 DoublesRick Moser / Brian Wurdeman vs Alex Alvarado / Ivan Cortez6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNathan Burt vs Gavin Albritton7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRogelio Espinoza / Christopher Ramirez vs Scot Hymas / Pablo Maldonado4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-02-20vs EW-CBRC-SathLost 03
L#1 DoublesRogelio Espinoza / Chris Denney vs Luis Cruz / Naudys Borrero4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesNathan Burt vs Gavin Albritton4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Wurdeman / Christopher Ramirez vs Scot Hymas / Ivan Cortez3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Michael Khounnala
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
2.46
Nathan Burt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Chris Denney
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
2.30
Christopher Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Rick Moser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.20
Brian Wurdeman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.14
Rogelio Espinoza
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rogelio Espinoza + Chris Denney033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michael Khounnala
47W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
Nathan Burt
8W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.46
2.5
Chris Denney
18W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.41
2.5
Christopher Ramirez
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Rick Moser
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Brian Wurdeman
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
Rogelio Espinoza
5W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.