Teams

TeamForman- 3.0 winners

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 18 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 3.5 Adult Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.72 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Emily Burrows
published
3.80
Amy Morrow
published 4
Deanna Etzold
published 4
3.72
3.69
Jessica Patino
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.47
Rebeca Villafane
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Leticia Diaz
published
3.41
Valerie Berrin
published
3.40
Lorena Guadiana
published
3.38
Maria Riccobono
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Yuliet Pellegrini
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Maggie Sanchez
published
3.30
Adriana Monsalve
usually #2 Singles 89%, also #1 Singles 11% · published 3.5
3.24
Amy Tolman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Jane Forman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Patino + Amy Tolman351258% games+15.3% vs expected
Emily Burrows + Amy Morrow9264% games+4.1% vs expected
Valerie Berrin + Rebeca Villafane5355% games+3.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Ruiz Velasco + Leticia Diaz6556% games+1.6% vs expected
Jessica Patino + Rebeca Villafane7458% games−3.0% vs expected
Amy Tolman + Rebeca Villafane7156% gamesnot enough data
Adriana Monsalve + Jessica Patino4165% gamesnot enough data
Adriana Monsalve + Rebeca Villafane224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Burrows
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Amy Morrow
31W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Deanna Etzold
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Caterina Castello
17W–18L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Jessica Patino
156W–64L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Rebeca Villafane
121W–83L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Leticia Diaz
78W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Valerie Berrin
33W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
Lorena Guadiana
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.40
3.5
Maria Riccobono
151W–76L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Yuliet Pellegrini
206W–125L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Maggie Sanchez
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Adriana Monsalve
181W–83L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Amy Tolman
115W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Elizabeth Ruiz Velasco
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.