Teams

Cooner18/2.5/WD/QTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Adult 18 & Over - Women Day · 2.5 Shrev

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-01vs Wood/18/2.5/WD/BTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesValerie Barcelona / Rachael Vanderlick vs Alison Luttkus / Ashley Paz6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLiz Navarre vs Laura Cope6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Barnett-Hubbell / Suszette Horn vs Kaitlin Wood / Jacqueline Gibson2-6, 2-6
2026-03-25vs Rickman-Rutkowski/18/2.5/WD/POTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMolly Quinnett / Judy Rose vs Molly Phares / Elizabeth Wadhwa7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJoli Nixon vs Alice Byington6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLiz Navarre / Lauren Price vs Marie-Alice Hobley-Depestre / Megan Pearce6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2026-03-18vs Deere/18/2.5/WD/STCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudy Rose / Lauren Price vs Aimee Deere / Ruby DeAlba6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJoli Nixon vs Laura Moore6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLiz Navarre / Michelle Barnett-Hubbell vs Christiana Lyons / Lauren Gibbs7-6, 6-3
2026-03-04vs Wood/18/2.5/WD/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Bush / Rachael Vanderlick vs Ashley Paz / Hannah Matheny6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesValerie Barcelona vs Meghan Brown6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMolly Quinnett / Judy Rose vs Chandni Chatrath / Laura Cope6-1, 6-3
2026-02-25vs Rickman-Rutkowski/18/2.5/WD/POTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesValerie Barcelona / Judy Rose vs Sandrine Brown / Calli Lorant6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJoli Nixon vs Megan Pearce6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Barnett-Hubbell / Suszette Horn vs Marie-Alice Hobley-Depestre / Hannah Bouchette6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-02-25vs Deere/18/2.5/WD/STCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Barnett-Hubbell / Suszette Horn vs Lauren Gibbs / Shannon Davidson7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesValerie Barcelona vs Jacie Wilson6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMolly Quinnett / Liz Navarre vs Ruby DeAlba / Aimee Deere6-3, 6-2
2026-02-20vs Wood/18/2.5/WD/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesRachael Vanderlick / Valerie Barcelona vs Kelli Shaw / Rose Whittington6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJoli Nixon vs Laura Cope6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Bush / Judy Rose vs Jacqueline Gibson / Kaitlin Wood7-6, 6-4
2026-02-18vs Deere/18/2.5/WD/STCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMolly Quinnett / Judy Rose vs Aimee Deere / Emily Smithwick6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJoli Nixon vs Jacie Wilson6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLiz Navarre / Lauren Price vs Christiana Lyons / Lauren Gibbs6-4, 6-1
2026-02-11vs Wood/18/2.5/WD/BTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesRachael Vanderlick / Valerie Barcelona vs Kaitlin Wood / Jacqueline Gibson4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJoli Nixon vs Meghan Brown6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEmily Bush / Lauren Price vs Alison Luttkus / Ashley Paz0-6, 5-7
2026-02-04vs Rickman-Rutkowski/18/2.5/WD/POTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesValerie Barcelona / Rachael Vanderlick vs Ainsley Rutkowski / Hannah Bouchette6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJoli Nixon vs Elizabeth Wadhwa6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMolly Quinnett / Suszette Horn vs Sandrine Brown / Megan Pearce6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cooner18/2.5/WD/QTC8225513180
2Wood/18/2.5/WD/BTC73171327243
3Rickman-Rutkowski/18/2.5/WD/POTC55121837263
4Deere/18/2.5/WD/STCC01062450347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Rachael Vanderlick
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published
2.55
Emily Bush
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.54
Joli Nixon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.54
Molly Quinnett
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.46
Judy Rose
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Valerie Barcelona
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.30
Suszette Horn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.17
Liz Navarre
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.01
Michelle Barnett-Hubbell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sumer Cooner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachael Vanderlick + Emily Bush5258% games+17.4% vs expected
Rachael Vanderlick + Valerie Barcelona7173% games+15.5% vs expected
Michelle Barnett-Hubbell + Suszette Horn5544% games+4.5% vs expected
Judy Rose + Molly Quinnett314 matchesnot enough data
Molly Quinnett + Valerie Barcelona213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachael Vanderlick
25W–8L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.75
3
Emily Bush
29W–22L career · type D · 10 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Joli Nixon
11W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
Molly Quinnett
15W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
Judy Rose
34W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.46
Valerie Barcelona
35W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
Suszette Horn
28W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Liz Navarre
14W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Michelle Barnett-Hubbell
8W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Sumer Cooner
14W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.