Teams

Oxford Mill (Neeru Jayanthi)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Men - Regular Levels · 5.0 Men (Zach Moore)

19 players · average NTRP 4.93 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesNeeru Jayanthi / Matthew Cozad vs Owen Stice / Mathew Marsico2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPaul Stanescu vs Jorge Vargas3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Felsenthal / Jay Torrence vs Douglas Gallagher / Sebastian Nunez6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCole Rigsby vs Miguel Este7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristopher Clarke / Bill Dopp vs Erick Bermudez / Romeo Luque Zanello4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-04vs USTA Atlanta/Drew AkinsLost 23
L#1 DoublesNathaniel Estes / Christopher Clarke vs Bob Strecansky / Drew Akins5-7, 6-2, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCampbell Harmon vs Rafael Rondino6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrian Coyle / Neeru Jayanthi vs Zach Jennings / Nicholas Palaio6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesXavier Pineda Botey vs Patrick Verstraete6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMikael Pettersson / Bill Dopp vs Jeremy Becht / Yannick Hass2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesBrian Coyle / Xavier Pineda Botey vs Danny Miron / Owen Stice7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNathaniel Estes vs Benjamin van Hout1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEddie Gonzalez / Matthew Cozad vs Amogh Mellacheruvu / Maanas Junghare6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCampbell Harmon vs Mathew Marsico6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Lahaie / Mikael Pettersson vs Samer Hasona / Johnathon Martin6-2, 7-5
2024-11-23vs USTA Atlanta/Drew AkinsLost 14
L#1 DoublesBrian Coyle / Andrew Felsenthal vs Drew Akins / Lucas Vaz6-3, 3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesXavier Pineda Botey vs Arul Gupta3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNeeru Jayanthi / Eddie Gonzalez vs Roberto Bazzarella / Daniel Prata5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesNathaniel Estes vs Patrick Verstraete7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJay Torrence / Cole Rigsby vs Harry Rawson / Nicholas Palaio0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men (Zach Moore) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.92
Campbell Harmon
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 5
4.91
Brian Coyle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.79
Matthew Cozad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Andrew Felsenthal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
Andrew Sobczyk
published 5
Bill Dopp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.72
Nathaniel Estes
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.68
Mikael Pettersson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.68
Andre Hames
published 5
4.55
Michael Lahaie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.46
Paul Stanescu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.39
Christopher Clarke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.35
Neeru Jayanthi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Cole Rigsby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Eddie Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Grovo Carmona
published
Jacob Kennedy
published
Jay Torrence
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Xavier Pineda Botey
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Coyle + Paul Stanescu3247% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Campbell Harmon
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.92
5
Brian Coyle
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.91
Matthew Cozad
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Andrew Felsenthal
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Andrew Sobczyk
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Bill Dopp
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nathaniel Estes
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.72
Mikael Pettersson
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.68
5
Andre Hames
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.68
Michael Lahaie
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.55
Paul Stanescu
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.46
4.5
Christopher Clarke
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
Neeru Jayanthi
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.35
Cole Rigsby
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Eddie Gonzalez
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Grovo Carmona
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jacob Kennedy
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay Torrence
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Xavier Pineda Botey
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.