Teams

Coffey, Celia

2026 Combo 40 & Over-JXN · Women 8.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.40 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs Thomas, DinaWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Jeffcoat / Melissa K Beach vs Barbara Mooney / Angie DeLeon6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmanda Mincey / Elizabeth MacPherson vs Stephanie Holt / Libby Jones6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesVanessa Wilson / Becky Pardue vs Kelly Howard / Dina Thomas2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-08-20vs Otto, JenLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Jeffcoat / Pshan Baine vs Joey Sessums / Dawn Farthing6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth MacPherson / Leslie Ledoux vs Ginny Dehart / Lara Martin0-6, 3-6
2026-08-06vs Thomas, DinaWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Jeffcoat / Lauree Davis vs Barbara Mooney / Carrie Eaton7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLeslie Ledoux / Becky Pardue vs Kelly Howard / Angie DeLeon6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 8.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Coffey, Celia1030123
2Otto, Jen0103636
3Thomas, Dina0103635

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Amanda Mincey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.25
Cami Stone-Hill
published 4.5
Becca Dickerson
published 4.5
3.89
Pshan Baine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Lisa Jeffcoat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Celia Coffey
published 4
3.70
Becky Pardue
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Lauree Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Melissa K Beach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Misty Stricklin
published
3.26
Elizabeth MacPherson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Leslie Ledoux
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vanessa Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauree Davis + Melissa K Beach6162% games+23.3% vs expected
Lauree Davis + Vanessa Wilson10075% games+8.6% vs expected
Lisa Jeffcoat + Cami Stone-Hill213 matchesnot enough data
Vanessa Wilson + Becky Pardue213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amanda Mincey
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.59
4.5
Cami Stone-Hill
9W–1L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Becca Dickerson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Pshan Baine
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.89
Lisa Jeffcoat
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.80
4
Celia Coffey
12W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Becky Pardue
25W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Lauree Davis
43W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.64
Melissa K Beach
34W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
Misty Stricklin
24W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Elizabeth MacPherson
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
Leslie Ledoux
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vanessa Wilson
20W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.