Teams

Gardner/LR/Reb

2024 Triple Threat Doubles League 18 & Over · 2.5 Triple Threat

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-03vs Gerard/NLR/BPWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteve Gardner / Mark Caruthers vs Clifton Hampton / Jamie Robinson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesClayton Smith / Scott Doose vs Julius Gerard / Joshua Wilson7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Triple Threat have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Holly Caruthers
published 3
2.91
Jessica Doose
published
2.79
Betsy Peeler
published 3
2.77
Holly Reding
published 3
2.53
Stephanie Byers
published
2.52
Mark Caruthers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Kimberly Gardner
published
Jeff Byers
published
Scott Doose
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Gardner + Stephanie Byers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Holly Caruthers
27W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.14
Jessica Doose
31W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Betsy Peeler
13W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Holly Reding
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Stephanie Byers
13W–23L career · no lines in 2024
0%40%60%
2.53
Mark Caruthers
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.52
Kimberly Gardner
7W–17L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.43
Jeff Byers
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Doose
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Steve Gardner
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.