Teams

1. October

2023 Virginia Refund Holding Area · Refund Holding Area

25 players · average NTRP 3.71 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refund Holding Area have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Jesse Cebulash
published 4
3.95
Johnny Hsiung
published 4
3.92
Dian Zhang
published 4
3.84
3.60
Khoa Tran
published
3.53
Peter Zhu
published
3.50
Maggie Moore
published
3.47
Chris Ford
published 4
3.46
Q Pennings
published
3.45
Kris Morris
published
3.40
Anthony Chang
published 3.5
3.38
Sharon Sabasteanski
published 3.5
3.36
Raman Batish
published 3.5
3.34
Melissa Allen
published 3.5
3.27
Barbara Durso
published 3.5
3.27
Deborah Eldridge
published 3.5
3.21
Donna Wade
published
3.20
Deanne Ralston
published 3.5
2.90
Monica Ghita
published
2.87
Patricia Hathaway
published
2.83
Jeanne Oostdyk
published
Julie Morris
published
Kara Stevenson
published
Robert Meister
published
Shannon Obrian
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Morris + Kris Morris9262% games+5.5% vs expected
Johnny Hsiung + Jesse Cebulash303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jesse Cebulash
330W–107L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Johnny Hsiung
573W–156L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Dian Zhang
228W–109L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Geoffrey Montgomery
320W–242L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.84
Khoa Tran
25W–29L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
Peter Zhu
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.53
Maggie Moore
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Chris Ford
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.47
Q Pennings
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
Kris Morris
50W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Anthony Chang
249W–160L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Sharon Sabasteanski
255W–176L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Raman Batish
77W–116L career · type S · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Melissa Allen
115W–116L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Barbara Durso
17W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Deborah Eldridge
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Donna Wade
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Deanne Ralston
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Monica Ghita
165W–95L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
Patricia Hathaway
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87
Jeanne Oostdyk
20W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Julie Morris
38W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kara Stevenson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Meister
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shannon Obrian
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.