Teams

OC LNRC - Kristie

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 3.5W

15 players · average NTRP 3.39 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 DoublesLalida Anderson / Maureen Dominguez vs Natalie Finn / MeganMary Mills6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTeresa Zack / Lijuan Huang vs Catherine Godlewski / Elisa Seapy6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-20vs OC Coto De Caza - TammyWon 40
W#1 DoublesLalida Anderson / Maureen Dominguez vs Fiorella Villar / Cathy Field2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLijuan Huang vs Gwen Stavros3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTeresa Zack / Katherine Brown vs Lynda Sims / Madona Shaheen6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristina Mecklenburg / Christine Andriola vs Dianna Claton / Lisa Kaplan6-1, 6-2
2026-03-06vs OC Mission Viejo CC - JannaLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrooke Wilkins / Teresa Zack vs Diane Miller / Holly Cook3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Mecklenburg / Lijuan Huang vs Jessica Keetch / Janna Lewis2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMaureen Dominguez / Lalida Anderson vs Laura Barron / Holly Ferber1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-06vs OC Irvine - Leslie - 9Won 20
W#2 DoublesLalida Anderson / Maureen Dominguez vs Nicole Miranda / Pam Schuler6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrooke Wilkins / Teresa Zack vs Consuelo Perez-Symons / Kristin Pechstein6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2026-01-30vs OC Dana Hills TC - SandyWon 21
L#1 DoublesTeresa Zack / Maureen Dominguez vs Jaime Jennings / Laurie Mellott5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLijuan Huang / Christina Mecklenburg vs Marcela McKibben / Sandy Sinden6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristie Carsten-Hensley / Aleksandra Grubin vs Suzanne Corvese / Kim Mccloskey6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTeresa Zack vs Trina Olsen6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoan Levis / Katherine Brown vs Elizabeth Warner / Cristina Gabriel2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKristie Carsten-Hensley / Lijuan Huang vs Kathy Teeple / Shirin Hellmold6-2, 6-3
2026-01-16vs OC MV Marguerite - Kelley - 1030Won 31
W#1 DoublesMaureen Dominguez / Lalida Anderson vs Patty Rydelski / Danielle Futrell6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTeresa Zack vs Dana Buckley6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristine Andriola / Cheryl Stahl vs Laura Anderson / Lissett MacHado4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLing Xu / Lijuan Huang vs Kelley McBride / CHRISTY PARENTE2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-01-09vs OC LNRC - BryLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Stahl / Christina Mecklenburg vs Cassie Hadfield / Lauren Steinbruner2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaureen Dominguez / Lalida Anderson vs Jennifer Sabol / Yoko Bannai6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTeresa Zack / Christine Andriola vs Crystal Holbrook / Somer Holstein3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Dayna Marinos
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.41
Lalida Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Maureen Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.40
Lijuan Huang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Teresa Zack
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Brooke Wilkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Cheryl Stahl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Kristie Carsten-Hensley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Christine Andriola
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Joan Levis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Christina Mecklenburg
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Aleksandra Grubin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Katherine Brown
published
Lynn Fair
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lalida Anderson + Maureen Dominguez421159% games+1.1% vs expected
Lalida Anderson + Lijuan Huang3247% games−4.1% vs expected
Lijuan Huang + Teresa Zack213 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Zack + Brooke Wilkins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dayna Marinos
22W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Lalida Anderson
86W–47L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Maureen Dominguez
122W–50L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Lijuan Huang
31W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Teresa Zack
16W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Brooke Wilkins
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Barbara Lynn Allison
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Cheryl Stahl
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristie Carsten-Hensley
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Christine Andriola
28W–83L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
Joan Levis
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Christina Mecklenburg
14W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Aleksandra Grubin
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Katherine Brown
21W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynn Fair
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.