Teams

Williams/FS/VH

2026 Mixed 18 & Over 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 · 3.5 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-21vs Gilliam/FS/HangoutWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoshua Kilgore / Jessica Irgens vs Mel Schaefer / Stephen Schaefer6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShane Irgens / Emillie Vick vs Dzung Vu / Glenna Gilliam1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMark Hoskyn / Britney Taake vs Nathan Marcotte / Caroline Beneux6-1, 6-4
2026-07-19vs Gilliam/FS/HangoutWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoshua Kilgore / Katy Prater vs Jennifer Jenkins / Joshua Jenkins6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesShane Irgens / Jessica Irgens vs Charles Warren / Mel Schaefer2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesNathan Garner / Christy Williams vs Dzung Vu / Glenna Gilliam6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-16vs Gilliam/FS/HangoutWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Hoskyn / Britney Taake vs Nathan Marcotte / Lisa Parker6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJoshua Kilgore / Katy Prater vs Dzung Vu / Caroline Beneux6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesNathan Garner / Emillie Vick vs Stephen Schaefer / Mel Schaefer2-6, 5-7
2026-07-09vs Gilliam/FS/HangoutLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoshua Kilgore / Emillie Vick vs Nathan Marcotte / Lisa Parker1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristy Williams / Shane Irgens vs Charles Warren / Caroline Beneux4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Irgens / Mark Hoskyn vs Mel Schaefer / Stephen Schaefer6-1, 6-3
2026-06-30vs Gilliam/FS/HangoutWon 21
L#1 DoublesShane Irgens / Katy Prater vs Nathan Marcotte / Caroline Beneux0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMark Hoskyn / Britney Taake vs Dzung Vu / Mel Schaefer6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoshua Kilgore / Christy Williams vs Joshua Jenkins / Jennifer Jenkins7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Williams/FS/VH419614142
2Gilliam/FS/Hangout146918138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Mark Hoskyn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Britney Taake
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Katy Prater
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Shane Irgens
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Emillie Vick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Jessica Irgens
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joshua Kilgore
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Nathan Garner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Britney Taake + Mark Hoskyn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Hoskyn
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Britney Taake
20W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
Katy Prater
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Shane Irgens
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.15
Emillie Vick
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Jessica Irgens
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.95
Joshua Kilgore
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nathan Garner
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.