Teams

BC-TorranceHigh/Collier5.0+

2026 SoCal Doubles - Beach Cities · BC Women - 5.0+

12 players · average NTRP 5.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 5.0+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.63 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.85
Tiana Takenaga
published
4.83
Tricia Mar
published
Alyssa Grijalva
published 5
4.72
Andrea Madrigal
published 5
4.70
Mandi Collier
published 5
4.66
Jennifer Beindorf
published
4.65
Carissa Park
published 5
4.57
Aki Eguchi
published 5
4.54
MacKenzie Hotan
published
4.53
Kristina Ebon
published 5
4.50
Lauren Nicole Finke
published
4.37
TRAM LY
published 5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aki Eguchi + TRAM LY4844% gamesnot enough data
Kristina Ebon + TRAM LY7165% gamesnot enough data
Kristina Ebon + Aki Eguchi224 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Madrigal + Aki Eguchi033 matchesnot enough data
Kristina Ebon + Lauren Nicole Finke123 matchesnot enough data
TRAM LY + Mandi Collier303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiana Takenaga
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
4.85
Tricia Mar
7W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.83
5
Alyssa Grijalva
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Andrea Madrigal
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%2%
4.72
5
Mandi Collier
188W–89L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.70
Jennifer Beindorf
15W–7L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.66
5
Carissa Park
40W–23L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.65
5
Aki Eguchi
166W–100L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.57
MacKenzie Hotan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
4.54
5
Kristina Ebon
133W–42L career · no lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.53
Lauren Nicole Finke
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
4.50
5
TRAM LY
139W–109L career · no lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
4.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.