Teams

JLiddle

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-10-10vs MGreenWon 21
W#1 DoublesOlga Stephens / Heather Roberts vs Katherine Canavan / Kate Pirrung6-0, 3-2
L#2 DoublesVanese Clough / Jacqueline Morgan vs Emma Coblentz / Katie Percy4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLynelle Clark / Julie Karg vs Kathryn Kiel / Tina McIntyre7-6, 6-4
2022-10-09vs ICconzola 18+ 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTakako Schenberger / Jennifer Wolborsky vs Evelyn Andino / Lisa Bakowski6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Jones / Vanese Clough vs Tassie McGannon / Dianna Erwin2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPetra Quan / Julie Liddle vs Laura Ross / Hope Graney6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-26vs CSmith/KoppLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Roberts / Julie Karg vs Anna Kouba / Melissa Graham4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPetra Quan / Vanese Clough vs Sarah Maynard / Lisa Pace4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHolly Eisenhour / Jennifer Taylor vs Emy Hanson / Ramsay Younger2-6, 1-6
2022-09-19vs KHuffstetler 18+Won 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Takako Schenberger vs Julee Knight / Lauren Hardwick6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Liddle / Petra Quan vs Mary Jo Nugent / Teri O'Neill6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Morgan / Vanese Clough vs Samantha Starr / Jade Paunovich6-3, 6-1
2022-09-12vs EMerrittSplit 11
L#2 DoublesOlga Stephens / Jacqueline Morgan vs Lee Veit / Julia Kerr2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTakako Schenberger / Holly Eisenhour vs Amy Baker / Katie McKenzie6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-08vs MGreenWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Karg / Takako Schenberger vs Katie Percy / Ashley Walton1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Liddle / Anna Jones vs Tina McIntyre / Heather Perry6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Taylor / Lynelle Clark vs Jennifer Duerr / Melissa Green6-1, 6-3
2022-09-01vs CSmith/KoppLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnna Jones / Olga Stephens vs Brittany Moye / Stacy Thiedeman7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHeather Roberts / Julie Karg vs Anna Kouba / Ramsay Younger2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLynelle Clark / Jennifer Wolborsky vs Sarah Maynard / Lisa Pace3-6, 2-6
2022-08-29vs ICconzola 18+ 6.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesPetra Quan / Julie Liddle vs Kelly Townsend / Elizabeth Black4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesOlga Stephens / Jacqueline Morgan vs Julie Brigham / Kacey Grudem7-6, 6-4
2022-08-26vs KHuffstetler 18+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesLynelle Clark / Julie Karg vs Kelly Huffstetler / Mary Jo Nugent4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Eisenhour / Shannon McNeill vs Summer DuMont / Samantha Starr5-7, 1-6
2022-08-18vs EMerrittWon 21
L#1 DoublesTakako Schenberger / Holly Eisenhour vs Lee Veit / Amy Baker7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShannon McNeill / Julie Liddle vs Alison Uthe / Libby Stubbs7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Jennifer Taylor vs Elizabeth Merritt / Amy Clarke6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Olga Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Vanese Clough
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Takako Schenberger
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Julie Liddle
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.02
Julie Karg
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.99
2.97
Lynelle Clark
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Jennifer Wolborsky
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.66
Holly Eisenhour
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Karg + Lynelle Clark14556% games+12.0% vs expected
Holly Eisenhour + Lynelle Clark3552% games+1.8% vs expected
Julie Karg + Julie Liddle10950% games−2.2% vs expected
Julie Liddle + Vanese Clough11368% gamesnot enough data
Takako Schenberger + Holly Eisenhour2744% gamesnot enough data
Takako Schenberger + Lynelle Clark5452% gamesnot enough data
Takako Schenberger + Julie Liddle3555% gamesnot enough data
Lynelle Clark + Julie Liddle3550% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Olga Stephens
232W–106L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Vanese Clough
176W–152L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Takako Schenberger
243W–154L career · 9 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Julie Liddle
216W–150L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Julie Karg
146W–138L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Jacqueline Morgan
23W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Lynelle Clark
152W–137L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Jennifer Wolborsky
172W–237L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Holly Eisenhour
59W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.