Teams

Double Trouble

Winter Adult 55 & Over Doubles · Ladies 8.0 55

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-22vs 5weet 5hotsWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristine Grant / Ferol Richardson vs Kim Grant / Amy McCarthy5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Dunbaugh / Durette Cawood vs Terees Shinn-Jenkins / Laura Burton5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Anne Clement / Brenda Latta vs Joanie Betron / Thea Woodruff6-3, 6-1
2026-03-08vs Wimberley 55Won 20
W#1 DoublesMary Anne Clement / Brenda Latta vs Tara Coco / Grainne Gilliam6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Butterfield / Karie Pettinati vs Lane Proctor / Wendy Gumbert6-3, 6-2
2026-03-01vs Hold My RacquetWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrenda Latta / Durette Cawood vs Angela Waterman / Tina Zientek5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Blum / Ferol Richardson vs Julie Madsen / Christine Foster6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJan Pierpoint / Marta Hotz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-22vs Drop Shot DivasWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Butterfield / Karie Pettinati vs Stacy Vaughn / Elizabeth Hanson Smith6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Shields / Durette Cawood vs Christine Rahm / Chris Whorley6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Anne Clement / Brenda Latta vs Carol Williams / Susan Harvin6-2, 7-5
2026-02-15vs BeastMode!Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Dunbaugh / Michelle Butterfield vs Camden Bobek / Terri Rose2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDurette Cawood / Ferol Richardson vs Melinda Floyd / Linda Haddox1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Latta / Mary Anne Clement vs Ellen Weaver / Melissa Velasquez3-6, 6-7
2026-02-08vs Ageless AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesDurette Cawood / Kathleen Dunbaugh vs Denise Scheaffer / Dee Jones7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKristine Grant / Karen Shields vs Sharon Brennan / Brenda Hoffman1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMary Anne Clement / Brenda Latta vs Shelley Daddurno / Lisa Laird6-1, 6-4
2026-02-01vs Berry SpicyWon 30
W#1 DoublesDurette Cawood / Ferol Richardson vs Denise Arndt / Cindy Bittenbinder6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Butterfield / Karie Pettinati vs Kristin Spencer / Karen Wilkins6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristine Grant / Brenda Latta vs Tricia Richards / Jennifer Harrison6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 8.0 55 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Durette Cawood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.90
Kristine Grant
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Julie Blum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Karie Pettinati
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Mary Anne Clement
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.78
Michelle Butterfield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Brenda Latta
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.67
Marta Hotz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Kathleen Dunbaugh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Jan Pierpoint
published
3.20
Karen Shields
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ferol Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karie Pettinati + Michelle Butterfield11068% games+12.5% vs expected
Marta Hotz + Brenda Latta14560% games+7.9% vs expected
Kathleen Dunbaugh + Mary Anne Clement4259% games+2.9% vs expected
Brenda Latta + Mary Anne Clement431661% games+1.4% vs expected
Kristine Grant + Karen Shields191353% games+1.2% vs expected
Brenda Latta + Karen Shields11750% games−0.6% vs expected
Kathleen Dunbaugh + Karen Shields3257% games−1.7% vs expected
Marta Hotz + Karen Shields3349% games−2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Durette Cawood
34W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Kristine Grant
58W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Julie Blum
48W–57L career · 1 line in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.84
Karie Pettinati
95W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
Mary Anne Clement
126W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Michelle Butterfield
61W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Brenda Latta
136W–72L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Marta Hotz
90W–73L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Kathleen Dunbaugh
81W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
Jan Pierpoint
62W–52L career · no lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.40
Karen Shields
69W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.20
Ferol Richardson
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.