Teams

OP-Baker 40s 3.0W SP

2025 Neuse River Adult 40 & Over League · 3.0 Women 40 & over

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-10vs BW-Moore 40s 3.0W SPWon 10
W#2 DoublesLori Baker / Susan Hardison vs Samira Said / Julie Warren6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-03vs GCC-Dempsey/Greene 40s 3.0W SPWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusan Hardison / Katherine James vs Juanita Yarrell / Shumena Horton6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMary Yarbrough vs Jenny Dempsey6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesYvonne Kleiman / Pam Taylor vs Nicole Carlyle / Lori Wagner2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Dotson / Tracy Taylor vs Keela Blango / Melissa Murray6-3, 6-1
2025-05-03vs GCC-Dempsey/Greene 40s 3.0W SPSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLori Baker / Susan Hardison vs Shumena Horton / Juanita Yarrell6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKatherine James vs Valerie DeBellis6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesYvonne Kleiman / Pam Taylor vs Nicole Carlyle / Lori Wagner5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesTracy Taylor / Deborah Dotson vs Melissa Murray / Keela Blango6-3, 6-4
2025-04-26vs GR-Thigpen 40s 3.0W SPWon 40
W#1 DoublesKatherine James / Susan Hardison vs Jennie Baggett / Kristi Geer6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAnnita Best vs Megan Pender6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLulu Conekin / Pam Taylor vs Rhonda Abbott / Kristen Gooch Taylor6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLori Baker / Sigrid Oppedal vs Erica Jones / Rebecca Helms6-2, 6-3
2025-04-13vs GCC-Dempsey/Greene 40s 3.0W SPSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAnnita Best / Katherine James vs Mary-Marshall Greene / Lori Wagner1-0
L#1 SinglesLulu Conekin vs Jennifer Hall6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori Baker / Pam Taylor vs KENNEDY BLOUNT / Courtney Steed6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca King / Sigrid Oppedal vs Jenny Dempsey / Melissa Murray6-1, 6-2
2025-04-12vs BW-Moore 40s 3.0W SPWon 21
W#1 DoublesLulu Conekin / Susan Hardison vs Paige Anderson / Kelly Varnell6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLori Baker / Yvonne Kleiman vs Julie Warren / Samira Said6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSigrid Oppedal / Pam Taylor vs Veda Moore / Meredith Fisher0-6, 1-6
2025-03-29vs GR-Thigpen 40s 3.0W SPWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnnita Best / Susan Hardison vs Kelli Dawson / Debbie Stephenson6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKatherine James vs Kristi Geer6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Dotson / Sigrid Oppedal vs Karen Copeland / Pam Mazingo6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLori Baker / Tracy Taylor vs Rebecca Helms / Michelle Langston6-1, 6-3
2025-03-22vs BW-Moore 40s 3.0W SPWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnnita Best / Katherine James vs Christie Teaney / Paige Anderson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLulu Conekin / Susan Hardison vs Veda Moore / Jennifer Holleran6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Dotson / Pam Taylor vs Suzanne Lea / Susan Monshaw6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-08vs GR-Thigpen 40s 3.0W SPLost 13
W#1 DoublesKatherine James / Susan Hardison vs Lakisha Dawson / Rhonda Abbott6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLori Baker vs Kristi Geer7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Dotson / Sigrid Oppedal vs Debbie Stephenson / Lisa Thigpen4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Panagopoulos / Mary Yarbrough vs Michelle Langston / Erica Jones1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 40 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Rebecca King
published
3.12
Katherine James
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.08
Annita Best
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
3.00
Susan Hardison
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Lulu Conekin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Deborah Dotson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Yvonne Kleiman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Lori Baker
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.54
Mary Yarbrough
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Linda Panagopoulos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sigrid Oppedal
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Hardison + Annita Best9176% games+12.0% vs expected
Yvonne Kleiman + Lulu Conekin8166% games−0.3% vs expected
Lori Baker + Yvonne Kleiman314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Hardison + Katherine James404 matchesnot enough data
Susan Hardison + Lulu Conekin404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca King
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Katherine James
18W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.12
3
Annita Best
30W–8L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.08
Susan Hardison
33W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Lulu Conekin
22W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Deborah Dotson
6W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yvonne Kleiman
15W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Lori Baker
26W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.67
Mary Yarbrough
19W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Linda Panagopoulos
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.29
Sigrid Oppedal
4W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.