Teams

HCC Wine for the Win - M. Roset

2024 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-02vs Hills/Agnew/55&Over9.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / AnneMarie Masson vs Mary Turnes / Ann Carlson6-0, 6-1
2024-02-24vs Hills/Agnew/55&Over9.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnneMarie Masson / Michele Ironsmith vs Christine Rondeau / Joan Simmons5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDianne Albina / Uyen Tran vs Tish Wissel / Jami Patterson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-10vs Hills/Agnew/55&Over9.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Uyen Tran vs Elizabeth Baldwin / Tish Wissel1-6, 2-6
2024-02-03vs Hills/Agnew/55&Over9.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / AnneMarie Masson vs Denise Agnew / Mary Paul6-4, 6-1
2024-01-27vs Hills/Agnew/55&Over9.0WLost 02
L#2 DoublesDianne Albina / Julie Martin vs Christine Rondeau / Katherine Reed3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAnneMarie Masson / Michele Ironsmith vs Elizabeth Baldwin / Tania Biller2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-20vs Hills/Agnew/55&Over9.0WWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / AnneMarie Masson vs Elizabeth Baldwin / Faith Sincich7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDianne Albina / Uyen Tran vs Karen Blount / Joan Simmons6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Michele Ironsmith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.30
Margaret Roset
published
4.19
Dianne Albina
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Uyen Tran
published
4.08
Katie Healy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Roset + Dianne Albina3651% games+0.7% vs expected
Michele Ironsmith + Dianne Albina213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michele Ironsmith
158W–102L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.50
Margaret Roset
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
4.30
4.5
Dianne Albina
96W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Uyen Tran
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
4.09
Katie Healy
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
4.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.