Teams

Seminole Lake Smash Girls

2022 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-27vs Pinellas - Bardmoor/GrossLost 01
L#2 SinglesAnne Remie vs Sally Blush6-7, 6-7
2022-03-26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCarol Vitelli / Beth Walters vs Victoria Tuller / Cindy Kobeda4-6, 5-7
2022-02-27vs Seminole Lake CokeWon 10
W#1 DoublesHarriet Cregann / Anne Remie vs Chary Acevedo / Nathalie Kobel4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-26vs Seminole Lake CokeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHarriet Cregann / Anne Remie vs Nympha Sison / Nathalie Kobel6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesFrances Parker / Christine Price vs Jeanne Ann Killam / Esthela Gonzalez5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-02-19Won 10
W#2 SinglesAnne Remie vs Diana Hallak4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-01-29vs SPTC Hot ShotsWon 20
W#1 DoublesHarriet Cregann / Anne Remie vs Breezy Paulus / Kenzier McIntyre7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristen Pierce / Beth Walters vs Juliet Auer / Brooke Rosenberg6-1, 6-3
2022-01-22vs Seminole Lake CokeLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnne Remie / Beth Walters vs Nympha Sison / Xi Mannari4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Jordan / Christine Price vs Chary Acevedo / Cathrine Chin6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Harriet Cregann
published 4
3.44
Jennifer Botelho
published
3.29
Anne Remie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Arlene Fricke
published 3.5
3.23
Carol Vitelli
published 3.5
3.20
Terry Kelsey
published
3.14
January Moennig
published
3.07
Kristen Pierce
published
3.02
Christine Price
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.81
Beth Walters
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
JoAnn Lind
published
Sherrl Fry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Price + Anne Remie4351% gamesnot enough data
Beth Walters + Christine Price4256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Harriet Cregann
9W–17L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
Jennifer Botelho
11W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Anne Remie
136W–73L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Arlene Fricke
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Carol Vitelli
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Terry Kelsey
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
January Moennig
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
Kristen Pierce
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Christine Price
99W–86L career · 8 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Beth Walters
22W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
JoAnn Lind
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherrl Fry
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.