Teams

NWO Combo 5.5W Klink/Willis-Findlay

2025 NWO Combo Fall League NWO · NWO Combo 5.5 Women Weekend

11 players · average NTRP 2.70 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-22vs NWO Combo 5.5W Smith -PTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesDawn Willis / Angela Gentry vs Cassie Hartzell / Amy Snyder0-6, 5-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesYumi Nishimura / Aimee Kearns vs Jamie Evans / Claire Langrish4-6, 2-5
L#3 DoublesMolly Wilkinson / Jennifer Campos vs Elizabeth Shapiro / Nicole Mohr1-6, 0-6
2025-11-09vs NWO Combo 5.5W Romney/Toland - PTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKara Klink / Shelley Bishop vs Andrea Born / Alyssa Emch6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDanielle Coats / Aimee Kearns vs Bonita Murphy / Brandi Sharlow2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesYumi Nishimura / Heather Kinsel-evans vs Julie Crawford / Brooke Miller2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKara Klink / Shelley Bishop vs Nasiba Mian / Stephanie Lancz1-6, 5-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Martin / Brandi Laurita vs Jessica Myak / Abby Holmblad0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDanielle Coats / Bethanne Bower vs Rachel Ade / Rayna Zacharias6-2, 5-2
2025-10-26vs NWO Combo 5.5W DeuceWon 30
W#1 DoublesDawn Willis / Angela Gentry vs Allison Kulwicki / Ever Bouyer6-2, 5-3
W#2 DoublesYumi Nishimura / Jennifer Martin vs Laura Hala / Kendra Barnes6-3, 3-1
W#3 DoublesDanielle Coats / Molly Wilkinson vs Kristen Boog / Caitlyn Lear6-3, 3-2
2025-10-25vs NWO Combo 5.5W MD LaunchpadLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrandi Laurita / Olga Livchak vs Rylee Mowery / Andrea Grove6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Campos / Bethanne Bower vs Gillian Sokol / Bayan Khriwish6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-11vs NWO Combo 5.5W Britton -SVCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKara Klink / Shelley Bishop vs Marcie Cousino / Joelle Obri7-5, 3-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDawn Willis / Angela Gentry vs Linda Torbet / Stefanie Calderone6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Campos / Heather Kinsel-evans vs Mary Bryant / Linda ODonnell2-6, 2-3
2025-10-04vs NWO Combo 5.5W Matt/LaunchpadSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAngela Gentry / Brandi Laurita vs Lindsay Beham / Madison Pettry6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKara Klink / Molly Wilkinson vs Kassandra Patino / Mary Lynn Reynolds6-3, 1-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesDawn Willis / Jennifer Martin vs Jodi Grzybowski / Adrianne Milano6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYumi Nishimura / Heather Kinsel-evans vs Patricia Gaffney / Michelle Walker6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · NWO Combo 5.5 Women Weekend
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO Combo 5.5W Romney/Toland - PTC8018615156
2NWO Combo 5.5W Damschroder/Myak-Launchpad7120413129
3NWO Combo 5.5W Smith -PTC6217715138
4NWO Combo 5.5W Britton -SVC44121226198
5NWO Combo 5.5W Klink/Willis-Findlay35121226176
6NWO Combo 5.5W Matt/Launchpad35101430194
7NWO Combo 5.5W MD Launchpad35101432220
8NWO Combo 5.5W Minicozzi/Worth-Launchpad1631836216
9NWO Combo 5.5W Deuce0721938211

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Dawn Willis
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Kara Klink
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Brandi Laurita
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Angela Gentry
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.45
Aimee Kearns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.37
Bethanne Bower
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.32
Olga Livchak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Shelley Bishop
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.14
Molly Wilkinson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Heather Kinsel-evans
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Yumi Nishimura
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kara Klink + Dawn Willis3450% games−3.9% vs expected
Dawn Willis + Brandi Laurita3251% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Willis + Angela Gentry314 matchesnot enough data
Kara Klink + Shelley Bishop123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dawn Willis
44W–62L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Kara Klink
69W–40L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Brandi Laurita
48W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
2.5
Angela Gentry
32W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%28%72%
2.58
2.5
Aimee Kearns
7W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.45
2.5
Bethanne Bower
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
Olga Livchak
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%91%9%
2.32
Shelley Bishop
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Molly Wilkinson
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
Heather Kinsel-evans
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yumi Nishimura
3W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.