Teams

CAMPBELL DAY

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 65 & over · Women 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-25vs BarlettWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Byrd / Barbara Pennington vs Sara Maurer / Michele Melin6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Hutchins / Donna Jaeckel vs Vicky Bell / Nancy Johnson6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSue Griffin / Cynthia Andrews vs Elizabeth King / Sharon Smith6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CAMPBELL DAY000000
2Barlett000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Barbara Hutchins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Candy Garrett
published 4
3.72
Sue Griffin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Pamela Furr
published
3.49
Barbara Pennington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Donna Jaeckel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Gail Landon
published
Cynthia Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Lena White
published
Linda Wilson
published
Moira Dailey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Pennington + Donna Jaeckel6067% games+15.4% vs expected
Gail Landon + Lena White6258% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbara Hutchins
27W–30L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Candy Garrett
23W–18L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
Sue Griffin
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Pamela Furr
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Barbara Pennington
30W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Donna Jaeckel
18W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Gail Landon
18W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Cynthia Andrews
2W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lena White
13W–10L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Linda Wilson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Moira Dailey
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.