Teams

Riverwalk

2024 Fall 18 & Over-Women-UPTA · 2.5 Women FF

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-15vs Rackettes/GCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeg Powers / Alyson Barrick vs Holly Sellers / Lauren Barber6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesOlga Paz vs Jessica Siler6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJessica McMullen / Heather Warren vs Ashley Boyd / Elizabeth Rasor6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2024-10-25vs GCC/SeaverWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlyson Barrick / Lauren Young vs Jennifer Coleman / Kristen McLean6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJessa Shiner vs Victoria Robinson6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJessica McMullen / Janna Neil vs Michelle Seaver / Virginia Hayes7-6, 6-4
2024-10-18vs UPTA18FF/Doyle/BrookstoneWon 20
W#1 DoublesJessa Shiner / Janna Neil vs Anna Leavitt / Cyndi Weinbaum6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeather Warren / Michelle Callahan vs Ashley Popham / Megan Tripamer7-5, 6-4
2024-10-11vs Thornblade SlagelLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Callahan / Rachael Cariveau vs Ashley Slagel / Casey Bell7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAlyson Barrick vs Margaret Crumpler6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJessica McMullen / Meg Powers vs Rachael Benson / Christina Colton6-0, 6-1
L#1 DoublesJanna Neil / Jessa Shiner vs Ashley Hill / Melissa Hucks3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJessica McMullen vs Kristen Benton2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Warren / Rachael Cariveau vs Diane Bright / Natallia Sianko6-1, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alyson Barrick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.71
Jessa Shiner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.43
Michelle Callahan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.28
Rachael Cariveau
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.20
Janna Neil
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jessica McMullen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Olga Paz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janna Neil + Jessa Shiner7160% games+8.0% vs expected
Michelle Callahan + Rachael Cariveau134 matchesnot enough data
Jessica McMullen + Janna Neil213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Callahan + Janna Neil303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alyson Barrick
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jessa Shiner
27W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%6%94%
2.71
Michelle Callahan
15W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.43
Rachael Cariveau
15W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.28
Janna Neil
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.20
Jessica McMullen
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Olga Paz
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.