Teams

BETC-Ikeda

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-11-02vs HBSQ-Hammers-PolettiLost 02
L#1 DoublesStuart Thompson / Scott Gunderson vs Bruce Adee / Paul Lorring1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Erickson / Martin Chang vs Scott Schlumberger / Willem Mager3-6, 2-6
2024-10-27vs EDG-Heavy Hitters-KellerLost 12
W#1 DoublesBruce Colley / Roy Higashi vs Michael Cung / Jack Young6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMark Weiser / Stuart Thompson vs Gary Nevins / Bradford Gliner4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Ikeda / Daniel Benoit vs Barry Strand / Lee Schelley1-6, 3-6
2024-10-19vs STC-RevereLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Blaisdell / Scott Gunderson vs Mark Revere / Karl Crabs2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Ikeda / Bruce Colley vs Doug Skrobut / Matt Hipps4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMartin Chang / Daniel Benoit vs John VanNewkirk / Rob Hendry2-6, 4-6
2024-10-12vs TCSP-Cougars Fall 2024-SmithLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Weiser / Steven Erickson vs Dan Holland / Tim Smith4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRoy Higashi / Scott Gunderson vs Jonathan Brown / Randy Woo4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStuart Thompson / Zane Blegen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-29vs MC-2025 Tigers 55's-SatoWon 21
W#1 DoublesStuart Thompson / Mark Weiser vs Noel Balantac / Alvin Sato4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Gunderson / Steven Erickson vs Jay Wellan / David Crisman6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJim Dugan / Martin Chang vs Terry Ward / Seth Fulcher3-6, 3-6
2024-09-21vs AYTC-Spirit-PatzLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Blaisdell / Jim Dugan vs Joe Duckett / Alfredo Castellanos0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSteve Ikeda / Mark Weiser vs Rick Downey / John Toutonghi6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesZane Blegen / Martin Chang vs Carter Woollen / Jon Bonnelle6-7, 4-6
2024-09-14vs CP-Ageless Bulls-MuenzLost 03
L#1 DoublesSteve Ikeda / Martin Chang vs Michael Hull / Walt Paulson6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRoy Higashi / Scott Gunderson vs Erik Gunvaldson / Henry Rawas3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Erickson / Stuart Thompson vs Sean Du / Joe Morrow1-6, 0-6
2024-09-08vs BETC-You Got This! SantoDomingoWon 21
L#1 DoublesMark Blaisdell / Bruce Colley vs Daniel Ivanis / Napoleon Cortez6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRoy Higashi / Stuart Thompson vs Daniel Kent / James Bolton6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesZane Blegen / Steven Erickson vs Michael Terrado / Ray Santos6-2, 6-2
2022-10-02vs BAIN-FergusonWon 10
W#3 DoublesLawson Mansfield / Daniel Benoit vs Thomas Geisness / Roger Wagner6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Roy Higashi
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.25
Mark Weiser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Daniel Benoit
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Martin Chang
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Scott Gunderson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Stuart Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Steven Erickson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Bruce Colley
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.03
Steve Ikeda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Mark Blaisdell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jim Dugan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Zane Blegen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Weiser + Steven Erickson9359% games+6.8% vs expected
Martin Chang + Scott Gunderson5646% games+6.5% vs expected
Roy Higashi + Steven Erickson5363% games+5.2% vs expected
Roy Higashi + Stuart Thompson8264% games+1.1% vs expected
Mark Blaisdell + Mark Weiser1543% games−6.8% vs expected
Mark Blaisdell + Steven Erickson2642% games−11.9% vs expected
Steve Ikeda + Mark Weiser3641% gamesnot enough data
Mark Weiser + Stuart Thompson4450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Roy Higashi
281W–155L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Mark Weiser
67W–72L career · 12 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Daniel Benoit
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Martin Chang
36W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Scott Gunderson
34W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Stuart Thompson
32W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Steven Erickson
37W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Bruce Colley
44W–72L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Steve Ikeda
40W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Mark Blaisdell
31W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.98
Jim Dugan
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zane Blegen
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.