Teams

Martin/Eshelman

2022 South East Tennis Combo League 40 & OVER · Womens 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-04vs BringardLost 01
L#2 DoublesSabrina Davis / Heather Senter vs Karyn Shane / Kristin Porcelli6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-09-15vs Glancy 40Lost 01
L#2 DoublesApril Eshelman / Heather Senter vs Patti Kucan / Tess Casals2-6, 2-6
2022-09-14vs Godfrey/MilkesLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Senter / Kristine Janik vs Kelly Godfrey / Angelia Gallimore0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-06vs Morgan Combo 40+ 7.5 2022Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSabrina Davis / Heather Senter vs Deedee Greene / Debbie Freeman3-6, 4-6
2022-08-25vs Murray/RobbinsWon 10
W#3 DoublesLena White / Heather Senter vs Anne Murray / Vickie Kosh7-6, 6-1
2022-08-18vs Wilson 7.5 (40)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSabrina Davis / Heather Senter vs Kathleen Timberlake / Laurie Sullivan0-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kristine Janik
published
3.36
Heather Senter
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Jean Nichols
published
3.31
Jenna Butler
published
3.26
Julie Dimock
published
Donna Jacobs
published 3.5
3.22
Sabrina Davis
published
3.16
Lena White
published
3.12
Shona Martin
published
2.67
April Eshelman
published 3
Jennifer Hawfield
published
Lorien Lamar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Dimock + Shona Martin3246% gamesnot enough data
Shona Martin + April Eshelman134 matchesnot enough data
Jenna Butler + Jean Nichols123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristine Janik
20W–20L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Heather Senter
245W–167L career · 15 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Jean Nichols
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
3.32
Jenna Butler
18W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
Julie Dimock
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Donna Jacobs
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sabrina Davis
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Lena White
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Shona Martin
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
April Eshelman
6W–19L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Jennifer Hawfield
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lorien Lamar
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.