Teams

The AquaNets Robinson-Cannon RTC

2026 USTA League Tennis Adult 40 & Over - RO · 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-17vs Liu Double Trouble RTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Lee / Ruby Gulati vs Yi-Chieh Chen / Camila Hallemeier4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesKarina Keogh vs Julia Routman1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesLisa Lee / Colleen Timimi vs Sabrina Guo / Natasa Letourneaut1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCarrie Robinson-Cannon vs Twyla Kuha6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMeg Repede / Karina Keogh vs Connie Chang / Sarah Segura6-1, 6-1
2026-04-26vs Liu Double Trouble RTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKarina Keogh / Meg Repede vs Anna Strand / Alaine Westra1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRuby Gulati / Colleen Timimi vs Erin Knoebel / Camila Hallemeier4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKarina Keogh / Ruby Gulati vs Natasa Letourneaut / Twyla Kuha0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesColleen Timimi / Carrie Robinson-Cannon vs Connie Chang / Aleksandra Kukla6-2, 6-4
2026-03-29vs Liu Double Trouble RTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesMeg Repede / Colleen Timimi vs SHUPEI LIU / Elizabeth Cozine0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRuby Gulati vs Anna Strand1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesCarrie Robinson-Cannon / Lisa Lee vs Colleen Batcheler / Natasa Letourneaut1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKarina Keogh vs Dihanna Duvaught5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesColleen Timimi / Meg Repede vs Connie Chang / Amy Rauk6-2, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liu Double Trouble RTC5111717142
2CrossCourts - RAC Batcheler Hertzfeldt3310817145
3The AquaNets Robinson-Cannon RTC1551327174

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.11 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.31
Carrie Robinson-Cannon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Karina Keogh
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.20
Colleen Timimi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
1.98
Meg Repede
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.85
Ruby Gulati
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Repede + Karina Keogh3746% games+6.6% vs expected
Karina Keogh + Ruby Gulati1441% games−1.8% vs expected
Meg Repede + Colleen Timimi134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Carrie Robinson-Cannon
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
Karina Keogh
11W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Colleen Timimi
7W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Meg Repede
7W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Ruby Gulati
3W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.