Teams

Nguyen - RS Clay

2026 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-14vs Ford - RS ClayWon 21
L#1 DoublesBonnie Bucco / Mecy Wimberly vs Tori Baker / Julie Reed4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTanya Hughes / Jacqueline Wallace vs Klara Szalai / Barbie Doherty4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Ross / Susan Barlow vs Courtney Fell / Kimberly Etscheid6-2, 6-2
2026-03-30vs Escambia/TanLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeannette Fabbro / Karen Penn vs Melanie DiLoreto / Ashley Keigley6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGloria Langan / Bonnie Bucco vs Dodi Stringfellow / Rene Abel5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSusan Barlow / Jennifer Capozzoli vs Heather Doerr / Kimberly Fortier6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-17vs Ford - RS ClayWon 40
W#1 DoublesGloria Langan / Susan Barlow vs Sissy Ford / Kimberly Etscheid5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBonnie Bucco vs Courtney Fell6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSue Nast / Mecy Wimberly vs Klara Szalai / Kim Gall3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThuy Nguyen / Kathy Ross vs Michelle Knisely / Barbie Doherty6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Jennifer Capozzoli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Karen Penn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Gloria Langan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Sue Nast
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Bonnie Bucco
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Mecy Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Jeannette Fabbro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Susan Barlow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Jacqueline Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Kathy Ross
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tanya Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Capozzoli
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.62
Karen Penn
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Gloria Langan
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Sue Nast
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Bonnie Bucco
16W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Mecy Wimberly
96W–91L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Jeannette Fabbro
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Susan Barlow
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Jacqueline Wallace
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
9%89%1%
3.18
Kathy Ross
24W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Tanya Hughes
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.