Teams

Zhou/Lekser

2026 Tri-Level Metro · 4.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / METROPOLITAN REGION

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Julia Milne
published
4.21
Huan Zhou
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.79
Satoko Tanimoto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Susan Lee
published
3.59
Adina Oditt
published 3.5
3.32
Lina Lekser
published 3.5
3.29
Mindy Luong
published
3.25
Bianca Isabela Catoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Milne
20W–19L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Huan Zhou
125W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4
Satoko Tanimoto
190W–123L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Susan Lee
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Adina Oditt
102W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Lina Lekser
97W–54L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Mindy Luong
16W–11L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Bianca Isabela Catoto
31W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.