Teams

SD 3.5 Mtn View (3:2)/ Padilla

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WD · SD - Women - 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesPerla Cardenas / Melissa Rubio vs Kaili Ghio / Caitlin Frazer2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBea Vega vs Marisa Kelly Jung0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAnette Tiznado / Cristina Medina vs Jacinthe Pare / Peggy Cuppy6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Jimenez vs Cindy Chu0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Monica Gomez Lopez / FLOR A SANCHEZ vs Diane Edge / Linda Olson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-26vs SD 3.5 LJTC (3:2)/ BrunoWon 41
W#1 DoublesNathalia Valles / Nancy Monica Gomez Lopez vs Lori Lovering / Mariko Uyeda7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesClaudia Nelson vs Paige Kratz3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPerla Cardenas / Cintya Palomares vs Tina Mertel / Erin Silav6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAdriana Diaz vs Bonnie Reilly5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCristina Medina / Anette Tiznado vs Irene Coppedge / Janet Costa6-1, 6-1
2026-05-19vs SD 3.5 Mtn View (3:2)/ PonceWon 32
W#1 DoublesNathalia Valles / Nancy Monica Gomez Lopez vs Celina Tiznado / JACQUELINE SAENZ6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMelissa Rubio vs Jade Findley6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesPerla Cardenas / Cintya Palomares vs Silvia Rodriguez / Elizabeth Ponce6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAdriana Diaz vs Luisa Garcia de la Cabada6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnette Tiznado / FLOR A SANCHEZ vs Celia Hernandez / Irma Ibarra3-6, 0-5
2026-05-12vs SD 3.5 Peninsula TC (3:2)/ TrentWon 41
L#1 DoublesClaudia Nelson / Elizabeth Jimenez vs Dianne Randquist / Lisa Mallory3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Rubio vs Angela Christian6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPerla Cardenas / Cintya Palomares vs Kathryn Miller / Daren Hillebrandt6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAdriana Diaz vs Wendy Collins6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesNathalia Valles / Anette Tiznado vs Annie Bixler / Cindy Diamse6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesAida Padilla / Claudia Nelson vs Maria Salas Kazmi / Maria Cristina Hach1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesBea Vega vs Ursula Becerra6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPerla Cardenas / Cintya Palomares vs Denisse Fax / Natalia Lombrozo7-6, 7-5
W#2 SinglesNancy Monica Gomez Lopez vs Natalie Vaca7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesFLOR A SANCHEZ / Cristina Medina vs Claudia Garcia / Brenda Henriquez7-5, 6-3
2026-04-21vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC (2:3)/ WestWon 32
W#1 DoublesCintya Palomares / FLOR A SANCHEZ vs Kelli Marovish / Christine Johnson4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAdriana Diaz vs Debora Rozen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnette Tiznado / Cristina Medina vs Connie Kocherga / Jessica Balli5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNancy Monica Gomez Lopez vs Hayley Connors3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Jimenez / Bea Vega vs Rachel Cline / Megan West3-6, 2-6
2026-04-14vs SD 3.5 PBTC (2:3)/ LevineLost 23
W#1 DoublesPerla Cardenas / Cintya Palomares vs Margot Hutchison / Kim Slaaf6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAdriana Diaz vs Janet Moore6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Jimenez / FLOR A SANCHEZ vs Leslie Sauer / ALEXIS MCCANDLESS2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMelissa Rubio vs Christiana Thieler5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAnette Tiznado / Aida Padilla vs Victoria Pearce / Alejandra Serrano0-6, 4-6
2026-03-31vs SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ KleinerWon 32
W#1 DoublesPerla Cardenas / Cintya Palomares vs Liliana Abbott / Kara West6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAdriana Diaz vs Klaudia Kapinos4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAida Padilla / Marisela Elizondo vs Lori Jellison / Heather Ravenscroft2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMelissa Rubio vs Marina Tomczak6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAnette Tiznado / Bea Vega vs Marva Gesell / Maren Outwater6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · SD - Women - 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD 3.5 Peninsula TC (3:2)/ Wilkinson71271333315
2SD WD LLW 3.5 Balboa Don't Lie/ Frazer71261435317
3SD 3.5 Mtn View (3:2)/ Padilla62241637349
4SD 3.5 Southwestern College (3:2)/ Lombrozo53241642363
5SD 3.5 LJTC (3:2)/ Bruno44211941342
6SD 3.5 Coronado TC (2:3)/ West44211944368
7SD 3.5 Mtn View (3:2)/ Stanley44211948385
8SD 3.5 Peninsula TC (3:2)/ Trent44192148371
9SD 3.5 PBTC (2:3)/ Levine35172349379
10SD 3.5 Coronado TC (2:3)/ Hackworth35172350376
11SD 3.5 Mtn View (3:2)/ Ponce35182251387
12SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ Monzon17142654379
13SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ Kleiner17112961432

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Cintya Palomares
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.36
Nathalia Valles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Adriana Diaz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Nancy Monica Gomez Lopez
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.31
Perla Cardenas
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.31
Cristina Medina
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Bea Vega
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Anette Tiznado
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.15
FLOR A SANCHEZ
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Elizabeth Jimenez
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.96
2.90
Melissa Rubio
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.76
Claudia Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3
2.56
Aida Padilla
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Marisela Elizondo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cintya Palomares + Perla Cardenas6069% games+11.8% vs expected
Aida Padilla + Bea Vega0729% gamesnot enough data
FLOR A SANCHEZ + Nancy Monica Gomez Lopez224 matchesnot enough data
Adriana Diaz + Nancy Monica Gomez Lopez123 matchesnot enough data
Anette Tiznado + Cristina Medina213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cintya Palomares
7W–0L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Nathalia Valles
6W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Adriana Diaz
15W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
Nancy Monica Gomez Lopez
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Perla Cardenas
6W–1L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Cristina Medina
3W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Bea Vega
154W–161L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Anette Tiznado
4W–3L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
FLOR A SANCHEZ
4W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Elizabeth Jimenez
2W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Frances Simpson Lang
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Melissa Rubio
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Claudia Nelson
9W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Aida Padilla
54W–135L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.56
Marisela Elizondo
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.