Teams

5.TOC.Pasteris

2022 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-08vs 1.KF.StoverLost 02
L#2 DoublesLydia Pasteris / Vesna Neiberger vs Marlene Fricano / Marilyn Brothers2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Stone / Cheryl Smyth vs Cherie Berger / Debbie Powell6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-05-01vs 2.TOC.ClarkeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTheresa Stone / Lydia Pasteris vs Diane Patton / Erin Conigliaro6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Smyth / Laura Anderson vs Jane Williams / Nannette Goodwin0-6, 1-6
2022-04-25vs 3.TOC.CuccaroWon 20
W#2 DoublesDara Haney / Theresa Stone vs Janel Green / Dana Rawls5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLydia Pasteris / Laura Anderson vs Olga Tiselsky / Emily Johnson6-3, 7-6
2022-03-27vs 1.KF.StoverWon 10
W#1 DoublesKate Falkiner / Dara Haney vs Julie Tapp / Cherie Berger6-1, 6-2
2022-03-20vs 3.TOC.CuccaroLost 02
L#1 DoublesDara Haney / Theresa Stone vs Janel Green / Kay Kajiwara1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Hill / Cheryl Smyth vs Erika Bailey / Sarah Ganong1-6, 2-6
2022-03-06Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCheryl Smyth vs Ira Duarte0-6, 2-6
2022-02-27vs 4.TOC.KempfLost 02
L#2 DoublesTheresa Stone / Dara Haney vs Maggie Wang / Carrie Couto6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLydia Pasteris / Emily Childs vs Lisa Kempf / Kimberly Patrey3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Kathryn Stone
published
3.68
Emily Childs
published 4
3.57
Theresa Stone
published
3.48
Dara Haney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Lydia Pasteris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Judith Stewart
published
3.01
Traci Brooks
published
2.91
Cheryl Smyth
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lydia Pasteris + Dara Haney213 matchesnot enough data
Dara Haney + Cheryl Smyth213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Stone
36W–27L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Emily Childs
39W–42L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Theresa Stone
11W–24L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Dara Haney
188W–138L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Lydia Pasteris
118W–96L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Judith Stewart
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Traci Brooks
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Cheryl Smyth
212W–231L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.