Teams

PAX:Paxton:O'Connor

2022 EMA Tri Level Fall 2022 · 3.5W

5 players · average NTRP / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesJulie O'Connor / Margaret Haidas vs Jean Norman-Clancy / Doreen Nichols6-2, 6-0
2022-10-30vs WAY:Wayside Green:ABC:CortazioLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatia Nicole Bobadilla / Jodi Sawyer vs Rebeca Cortazio / Maureen Mullen3-6, 0-6
2022-10-23vs PAX;Ms. Hits:RogersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie O'Connor / Margaret Haidas vs Christine Richard / Monica Rogers6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesMickey Donahue / Katia Nicole Bobadilla vs Alexis Fettig / Yolanda Youtsey6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-10-09vs WAY:Wayside Green:ABC:CortazioLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatia Nicole Bobadilla / Julie O'Connor vs Lindsay Cao / Rebeca Cortazio4-6, 2-6
2022-10-02vs PAX;Ms. Hits:RogersLost 01
L#1 DoublesMickey Donahue / Julie O'Connor vs Christine Richard / Joanne Grzembski3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKatia Nicole Bobadilla / Margaret Haidas vs Alexis Fettig / Jean Norman-Clancy2-6, 4-6
2022-09-18vs WAY:Wayside Green:ABC:CortazioLost 01
L#1 DoublesMickey Donahue / Julie O'Connor vs Lindsay Cao / Maureen Mullen7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2022-09-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKatia Nicole Bobadilla / Julie O'Connor vs Monica Rogers / Whitney Brown1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WAY:Wayside Green:ABC:Cortazio8181349
2LFW:Wayland:Williams/Fordiani6262555
3WAY:Wayside:Pulnik/Burri6262670
4PAX;Ms. Hits:Rogers5454976
5LTC:Lexington TC:Miller/Weidman4444977
6LFW:Wayland:Ellenbogen35351174
7WESB:Llaministas;Nichols/Sullivan-Kreiss363614100
8PAX:Paxton:O'Connor27271492
9LFW:Wayland:Ackerley17171592

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Margaret Haidas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Jodi Sawyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Mickey Donahue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Julie O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Katia Nicole Bobadilla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodi Sawyer + Katia Nicole Bobadilla3253% games+5.5% vs expected
Mickey Donahue + Katia Nicole Bobadilla6846% games−5.8% vs expected
Julie O'Connor + Mickey Donahue044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Haidas
81W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Jodi Sawyer
33W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Mickey Donahue
97W–77L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Julie O'Connor
89W–54L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Katia Nicole Bobadilla
55W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.