Teams

SRTC Smith

2023 OH OV FALL 40&O Mixed · FALL 40&O 8.0MXD

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Westfall / Kelli Melvin vs Greg Toman / Patricia Gilmore7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-12-10vs QRRC JohannesWon 10
W#2 DoublesJonathan Westfall / Kelli Melvin vs Aaron Wolters / Patricia Gilmore6-4, 6-4
2022-11-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesJonathan Westfall / Carol Poe vs Roy Stevens / Lorena Esparza7-6, 6-1
2022-11-13vs QRRC WeaverWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Bailey / Kelli Melvin vs Robert Huston / Sherri Zahorian6-3, 6-3
2022-10-21vs KTC StevensWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelli Melvin / Jonathan Westfall vs Melissa Cho / Kyle Nagel6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-16vs STC RitzeWon 10
W#2 DoublesJonathan Westfall / Kelli Melvin vs Eric Holterman / Audrey Vanhoose6-4, 6-1
2022-09-30vs QRRC WeaverLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelli Melvin / John Bailey vs Lunilia Crespo / Brooks Compton6-7, 2-6
2022-09-11vs STC RitzeWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelli Melvin / Jonathan Westfall vs Eric Salter / Renuka Dewan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · FALL 40&O 8.0MXD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1QRRC Johannes7117718190
2QRRC Weaver5316824220
3SRTC Smith5315924216
4KTC Stevens2661840270
5STC Ritze1761837247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Samantha Enslen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.86
Kelli Melvin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.85
Raya Tabrah
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
David Ehlers
published 4
3.70
Carol Poe
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.70
Jonathan Westfall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Dave Measley
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Rick Quigley
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelli Melvin + Jonathan Westfall20853% games−1.1% vs expected
Samantha Enslen + Dave Measley3349% games−1.7% vs expected
Raya Tabrah + Dave Measley8851% games−1.9% vs expected
Jonathan Westfall + Carol Poe3250% games−5.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Enslen
94W–106L career · 5 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
4.03
Kelli Melvin
146W–115L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.86
Raya Tabrah
121W–120L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
David Ehlers
22W–31L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Carol Poe
234W–171L career · 7 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Jonathan Westfall
134W–100L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Dave Measley
137W–129L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Rick Quigley
67W–69L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.