Teams

CTC Cross

2026 OH OV FALL A40&O Charleston · 2026 FALL A 40&O 3.5 WOMEN Charleston

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 FALL A 40&O 3.5 WOMEN Charleston have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Aileen Stacy
published 3.5
Deidra Muto
published 3.5
3.07
Crystal Bastin
published 3
Amanda Campbell
published 3
Ellen Johnstone
published
Jamie Goetz
published
Kirsten Mork
published
Lia Fairless
published
Lilah Michael
published
Mary McJunkin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Crystal Bastin + Mary Elisabeth Eckerson6265% gamesnot enough data
Aileen Stacy + Lilah Michael404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aileen Stacy
24W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Deidra Muto
4W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Crystal Bastin
46W–35L career · no lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Amanda Campbell
13W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ellen Johnstone
12W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jamie Goetz
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kirsten Mork
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lia Fairless
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lilah Michael
36W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Elisabeth Eckerson
12W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary McJunkin
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.