Teams

LS: Serve Me Another: Frey/Caulkins

2025 ECT Adult 18& Non Advancing Women · 2025 Spring 2.5 W Non Advancing

9 players · average NTRP / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-29vs LS: Lennon Lyme Delights: LennonLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichele Frey / Emilie Blinderman vs Jen Marshall / Chelsey Russ6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNicola Hanssmann vs Spencer Cook1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSheila Ring / Micaela Caulkins vs Kelsey Murphy / Karen Brovero3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-15vs GF: Glam Slammers: LeeLost 12
W#1 DoublesEmilie Blinderman / Emma Doyle vs Patricia Lee / Rebecca Streeter6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesNicola Hanssmann vs Hanna King4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Detoma / Micaela Caulkins vs Lily Perry Prioreschi / Lauren Martini7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-08vs LS: Slice Girls: DouglasWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobyn Wojeck / Michele Frey vs Noel Robinson / Shirlee Bochanis6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKeeton Leisure vs Melissa Terry6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSheila Ring / Rebecca Detoma vs Ana Marinez / Andrea Adelman6-2, 6-4
2025-06-01vs LS:Tequila & Lyme:Trusilo/FabriziLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichele Frey / Emilie Blinderman vs Anastasia Boyd / Christine Andrew4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNicola Hanssmann vs Cecilia Curley3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRobyn Wojeck / Rebecca Detoma vs Cathie Sedlack / Sarah Mayer6-0, 6-0
2025-05-04vs LS: Lennon Lyme Delights: LennonLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmilie Blinderman / Keeton Leisure vs Spencer Cook / Michela Mayhew0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNicola Hanssmann vs Katherine Flynn6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheila Ring / Robyn Wojeck vs Jean Lennon / Jen Marshall2-6, 6-7
2025-04-12vs GF: Glam Slammers: LeeLost 12
W#1 DoublesNicola Hanssmann / Emma Doyle vs Patricia Lee / Wendy Ward6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRobyn Wojeck vs Hanna King3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Frey / Micaela Caulkins vs Lily Perry Prioreschi / Amy Wasterlain0-6, 5-7
2025-04-06vs LS: Slice Girls: DouglasWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmilie Blinderman / Rebecca Detoma vs Diane Cathcart / Michaela Ozycz6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMicaela Caulkins vs Shirlee Bochanis6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichele Frey / Robyn Wojeck vs Joanna Douglas / Stephanie Ma6-1, 6-0
2025-03-23vs LS:Tequila & Lyme:Trusilo/FabriziWon 21
L#1 DoublesMicaela Caulkins / Emma Doyle vs Cecilia Curley / Christine Andrew1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesEmilie Blinderman vs Crystal King6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRebecca Detoma / Nicola Hanssmann vs Elizabeth Fabrizi / Sarah Mayer6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2025 Spring 2.5 W Non Advancing
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LS: Lennon Lyme Delights: Lennon0816817165
2LS:Tequila & Lyme:Trusilo/Fabrizi0816820192
3GF: Glam Slammers: Lee08141022191
4LS: Serve Me Another: Frey/Caulkins08131123181
5LS: Slice Girls: Douglas0812346270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.62
Robyn Wojeck
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.56
Michele Frey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.38
Emilie Blinderman
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.34
Emma Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Keeton Leisure
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.24
Micaela Caulkins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.14
Rebecca Detoma
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.11
Nicola Hanssmann
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Sheila Ring
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emilie Blinderman + Michele Frey3258% games−3.4% vs expected
Michele Frey + Micaela Caulkins314 matchesnot enough data
Michele Frey + Robyn Wojeck314 matchesnot enough data
Nicola Hanssmann + Rebecca Detoma123 matchesnot enough data
Nicola Hanssmann + Emma Doyle213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robyn Wojeck
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62
Michele Frey
13W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
Emilie Blinderman
7W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
Emma Doyle
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
Keeton Leisure
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.28
Micaela Caulkins
7W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Rebecca Detoma
5W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
Nicola Hanssmann
13W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Sheila Ring
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.