Teams

Morris - Let Love Rule

2026 Howard Adult 40 & Over · Howard Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-24vs Alonso - En FuegoWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngela Mason / Jacqueline Easley vs Jamilla Galloway / Emily Warner6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKavita Kalra / Beverly Graham vs Kim Herman / Kimberlee Schulden7-5, 6-4
2026-07-16vs Alonso - En FuegoWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngela Mason / Jacqueline Easley vs Kimberlee Schulden / Dale Templeton6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTannan Hagyard vs Katharine Mellendick6-2, 6-0
2026-07-12vs Alonso - En FuegoWon 21
L#1 DoublesKavita Kalra / Courtney Robertson vs Cindy Greenwood / Kathleen Kelly2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJacqueline Easley vs Katharine Mellendick6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBetsy Morris / Beverly Graham vs Kim Herman / Dale Templeton6-2, 7-5
2026-07-09vs Alonso - En FuegoWon 21
L#1 DoublesAngela Mason / Christine Matney vs Lisa Alonso / Kathleen Kelly6-7, 3-4
W#1 SinglesTannan Hagyard vs Jamilla Galloway7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBetsy Morris / Beverly Graham vs Dale Templeton / Lauren Snyder6-2, 6-0
2026-07-07vs Alonso - En FuegoWon 21
L#1 DoublesTannan Hagyard / Christine Matney vs Cindy Greenwood / Kathleen Kelly4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJiashi Zhao vs Lauren Snyder6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBetsy Morris / Romina Averza vs Kimberlee Schulden / Kim Herman6-0, 6-4
2026-06-29vs Alonso - En FuegoLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeverly Graham / Tannan Hagyard vs Jamilla Galloway / Kathleen Kelly3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChristine Matney vs Lauren Snyder6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCourtney Robertson / Romina Averza vs Dale Templeton / Emily Warner4-6, 6-5
2026-06-20vs Alonso - En FuegoWon 30
W#1 DoublesBetsy Morris / Jiashi Zhao vs Dale Templeton / Emily Warner6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesChristine Matney vs Kim Herman7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTannan Hagyard / Kavita Kalra vs Kimberlee Schulden / Lisa Alonso6-1, 6-3
2026-06-16vs Alonso - En FuegoWon 30
W#1 DoublesKavita Kalra / Jiashi Zhao vs Kathleen Kelly / Emily Warner6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTannan Hagyard vs Lauren Snyder6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAngela Mason / Betsy Morris vs Dale Templeton / Kimberlee Schulden6-3, 6-0
2026-06-11vs Alonso - En FuegoLost 12
L#1 DoublesTannan Hagyard / Romina Averza vs Cindy Greenwood / Katharine Mellendick2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Easley vs Jamilla Galloway6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCourtney Robertson / Betsy Morris vs Emily Warner / Kimberlee Schulden7-5, 5-3
2026-06-02vs Alonso - En FuegoLost 12
L#1 DoublesCourtney Robertson / Jacqueline Easley vs Cindy Greenwood / Lisa Alonso1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAngela Mason vs Jamilla Galloway4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJiashi Zhao / Kavita Kalra vs Emily Warner / Katharine Mellendick7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Jacqueline Easley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.40
Romina Averza
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.40
Christine Matney
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.38
Angela Mason
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
2.32
Betsy Morris
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.32
Tannan Hagyard
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.23
Jiashi Zhao
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.04
Courtney Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.96
Kavita Kalra
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Easley + Angela Mason224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacqueline Easley
6W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
2.5
Romina Averza
30W–71L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Christine Matney
11W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Angela Mason
6W–18L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Betsy Morris
11W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Tannan Hagyard
35W–85L career · 14 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Jiashi Zhao
12W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Courtney Robertson
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Kavita Kalra
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.