Teams

SV ORANGE

2023 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

5 players · average NTRP 2.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-19vs CR-DC YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Lehmann / Betsy Tapp vs Leslie Cummings / Heather Grimes6-0, 6-0
2023-07-12vs PRKR GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWhitney Coakley / Jill Nabena vs Andreina Martinez / Kristina Moore6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCynthia Boyce / Laurie Lehmann vs Rita Fitzpatrick / Rachel Hiemstra3-6, 4-6
2023-07-05vs SS-LT YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Nabena / Lorri Basile vs Suzanne Paul / Aura Leigh Ferguson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaurie Lehmann / Cynthia Boyce vs Jean Finegan / Judy Weisiger6-1, 7-5
2023-06-28vs PCC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesLorri Basile / Whitney Coakley vs Dawn D'Amato / Renee Dyer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCynthia Boyce / Laurie Lehmann vs Cheryl Ann OBrien / Lais Schmidtello4-6, 1-6
2023-06-21vs CPV BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesLorri Basile / Laurie Lehmann vs Carolyn Marchant / Corby Williams6-1, 6-1
2023-06-14vs CCV REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesLorri Basile / Betsy Tapp vs Jennifer Bub / Kate Bostock6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesWhitney Coakley vs Ashley Hastedt6-1, 6-1
2023-06-07vs VCC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesLorri Basile / Whitney Coakley vs Wendy Titus / Lauren Baker6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Lehmann / Jill Nabena vs Cammie Rausch / Shelly Whitehead6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Whitney Coakley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.60
Lorri Basile
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Betsy Tapp
published 3
2.27
Laurie Lehmann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.11
Cynthia Boyce
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorri Basile + Whitney Coakley9359% games+5.4% vs expected
Lorri Basile + Laurie Lehmann111647% games+3.1% vs expected
Betsy Tapp + Lorri Basile0539% games−7.6% vs expected
Betsy Tapp + Laurie Lehmann11134% games−9.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Whitney Coakley
46W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Lorri Basile
44W–68L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Betsy Tapp
4W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Laurie Lehmann
51W–78L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Cynthia Boyce
9W–20L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.