Teams

KParker/JB/Three Oaks

2025 Combo 40 & Over 5.5, 7.5 · 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-20vs LParker/JB/JCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesWendy Evins / Jamie Chandler vs Mallorie Hughes / Tamara Lee6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Milton / Tera Harpole vs Stefanie Rouse / Caroline Wilson6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDeana Muegge / Danae Sandusky vs Janelle Hocutt / Alyssa Wenger1-6, 4-6
2025-10-14vs LParker/JB/JCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLindi Wade / Jeanne Bailey vs Joan Khilling / Mallorie Hughes7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Fancher / Tera Harpole vs Michelle Myers / Stefanie Rouse6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSarah Milton / Tiffany Floyd vs Alyssa Wenger / Kimberly Moseley6-0, 6-1
2025-09-10vs LParker/JB/JCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesWendy Evins / Danae Sandusky vs Joan Khilling / Mallorie Hughes7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLindi Wade / Melanie Burnett vs Alyssa Wenger / Caroline Wilson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Fancher / Jamie Chandler vs Stefanie Rouse / Michelle Myers6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Sarah Milton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Wendy Evins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Lindi Wade
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
2.89
Candace Sanders
published 3
2.72
Melanie Burnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Jamie Chandler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Deana Muegge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Jeanne Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Tiffany Floyd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Danae Sandusky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.35
Tera Harpole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Evins + Kelly Dionne Moody Parker11263% games+1.3% vs expected
Melanie Burnett + Tera Harpole303 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Burnett + Jeanne Bailey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Milton
31W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
Wendy Evins
25W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Lindi Wade
22W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Kelly Dionne Moody Parker
24W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Candace Sanders
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Melanie Burnett
25W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%6%94%
2.72
Jamie Chandler
29W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Deana Muegge
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Jeanne Bailey
18W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
0%20%80%
2.62
Tiffany Floyd
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
3
Danae Sandusky
13W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
Tera Harpole
24W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.