Teams

OC Team Courage - Irvine Nisha

2025 USTA Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - OC · OC - 7.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

18 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesKristi Wechsler / Brandon Dinsbach vs Lauren Prelesnik / Caleb Prelesnik5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNisha Anish / Suraj Satpathy vs Jacqueline Jernigan / Robert Kelly6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMonica Kirby / Neb Petrovacki vs Annie Clark / Chris Stamm6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 7.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Edgar Tellez
published 4
3.51
Kaustubh Deshpande
published
3.47
Nisha Anish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Forrest Morrow
published 3.5
3.35
CZARINA VISPERAS
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Eric Campos
published 3.5
3.34
Monica Kirby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Irene Fehr
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Neb Petrovacki
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Kristi Wechsler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Brandon Dinsbach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Leslie Le
published
3.14
Nancy Casey
published
3.07
Nicole Miranda
published
2.59
Katherine Lasiter
published
Leonard Wang
published
Maki Nagano
published
Suraj Satpathy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi Wechsler + Brandon Dinsbach4258% gamesnot enough data
Forrest Morrow + Nancy Casey3263% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edgar Tellez
5W–19L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
Kaustubh Deshpande
27W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Nisha Anish
27W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Forrest Morrow
26W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
CZARINA VISPERAS
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Eric Campos
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Monica Kirby
18W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Irene Fehr
99W–98L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
Neb Petrovacki
28W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Kristi Wechsler
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Brandon Dinsbach
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Leslie Le
22W–38L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Nancy Casey
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.14
Nicole Miranda
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07
Katherine Lasiter
0W–14L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.59
Leonard Wang
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maki Nagano
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Suraj Satpathy
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.