Teams

I'd Hit That - Mission Oaks

2024 USTA Mixed 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Mixed 18&Over 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-24vs PierpontWon 10
W#1 DoublesLauren Napoli / Jay Campbell vs Michelle Duddy / Alexander Cho7-5, 7-6
2024-03-17vs Mixed TroublesWon 10
W#3 DoublesKeressa Garland / Miles Hogan vs Margery Teller / Erik Houser6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesKeressa Garland / Miles Hogan vs Annik Bogharian / Jose MacKinney6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-03vs North Ranch ScrewballsWon 20
W#1 DoublesLauren Napoli / Jay Campbell vs Ali Motamedi / Maggie Ham6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKeressa Garland / Miles Hogan vs Richard Gallagher / LAURA BROWN6-3, 6-3
2024-02-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJim Brown / Lauren Napoli vs Casey Patterson / Lexi Patterson4-6, 1-6
2024-02-09vs DAM Ball WACkersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJim Brown / Lauren Napoli vs Judy Caparon / Gary Moss7-5, 6-3
2024-01-24vs Sunset Hot ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJim Brown / Lauren Napoli vs Cory Rodrigues / Gloria Liu6-4, 6-4
2024-01-14vs Malibu RippersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJohn Cotsis / Lauren Napoli vs Candace Kelly / JASON BONZON4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKeressa Garland / Michael Garland vs Rory Kennedy / Randy Olson6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Mixed 18&Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Danny Everett
published 3.5
3.51
Lauren Napoli
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.33
Michael Garland
published
3.22
Wendy Brown
published
3.19
Myla Hanson
published
3.17
Matthew Maxel
published
3.08
Keressa Garland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.07
John Cotsis
published
Linda Hewitt
published
Miles Hogan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danny Everett
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Lauren Napoli
144W–52L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
Michael Garland
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Wendy Brown
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Myla Hanson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Matthew Maxel
8W–20L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3
Keressa Garland
88W–113L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.08
John Cotsis
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.07
Linda Hewitt
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Miles Hogan
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.