Teams

Alban

2024 Frederick Adult 40 & Over · Frederick Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.57 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-05-04vs Play It ForwardLost 12
L#1 DoublesMillette Miller / Pamela Gowen vs Deborah Wright / Deborah Dettmer3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMIchelle Jeram vs Nikki Eyman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJodi Hathaway / Bridgett Patterson vs Katherine Dodson / Carina Villagra6-2, 6-2
2024-04-28vs Tiebreakers 40+Won 20
W#1 SinglesJodi Hathaway vs Kate Ansalvish5-7, 4-2
W#2 DoublesPamela Gowen / Linda McArthur vs Julia Johnson / Rebecca DeGioia6-4, 6-3
2024-04-21vs Tennis TherapyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSabrina Alban / Jodi Hathaway vs Sandy Thongphok / Julie Edwards6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLoan Nguyen / MIchelle Jeram vs Karen Jones / Leslie Mansfield2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMary Beth Herrera / Linda McArthur vs Suzanne Krudys / Kristin Ostlie2-6, 1-6
2024-04-17vs Play It ForwardWon 20
W#1 SinglesJodi Hathaway vs Stephanie Heinrichs6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMeghan Bresee / Pamela Gowen vs Laura McNay / Carina Villagra6-1, 7-6
2024-04-07vs Tennis TherapyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSabrina Alban / Jodi Hathaway vs Julie Edwards / Roxanna Nemec6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLinda McArthur vs Sandy Thongphok2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBridgett Patterson / Barbara Tobler vs Karen Jones / Mesanie Lee0-6, 2-6
2024-04-06vs Play It ForwardLost 01
L#1 DoublesJodi Hathaway / Pamela Gowen vs Claudia Holanda / Nicole Brizan6-7, 4-6
2024-04-01vs Tiebreakers 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesSabrina Alban / Jodi Hathaway vs Taeko Wakasono / Lori Lynn Sines6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMeghan Bresee / Pamela Gowen vs Teresa Reefe / Rebecca DeGioia6-3, 7-5
2024-03-26vs Tiebreakers 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesSabrina Alban / Jodi Hathaway vs Teresa Reefe / Elizabeth Baker6-2, 7-5
2024-03-24vs Tennis TherapyLost 12
W#1 DoublesJodi Hathaway / Loan Nguyen vs Karen Coyne / Julie Edwards7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPamela Gowen / Barbara Tobler vs Sandy Thongphok / Mesanie Lee3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJodie Phillips / MIchelle Jeram vs Suzanne Krudys / Roxanna Nemec0-6, 6-7
2024-03-23vs Play It ForwardSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJodi Hathaway / Bridgett Patterson vs Deborah Wright / Sharon Edelstein6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJodie Phillips / MIchelle Jeram vs Miki Reed / Denise Levis7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-17vs Tiebreakers 40+Won 20
W#1 SinglesJodi Hathaway vs Kate Ansalvish3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPamela Gowen / Barbara Tobler vs Erika Gilbert / Hilary Broder6-2, 6-3
2024-03-09vs Tennis TherapyWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Wheat / Pamela Gowen vs Rebecca Stewart / Leslie Mansfield4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJodi Hathaway vs Giselle Medina6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMIchelle Jeram / Barbara Tobler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Jodi Hathaway
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.53
Sabrina Alban
published
3.36
MIchelle Jeram
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Bridgett Patterson
published 3.5
3.14
Jodie Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Pamela Gowen
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.06
Janine Kaganzev
published
3.02
Linda McArthur
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Barbara Tobler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Kimberly Price
published
Mary Beth Herrera
published
Millette Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Gowen + MIchelle Jeram134 matchesnot enough data
Jodie Phillips + Linda McArthur224 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Gowen + Barbara Tobler123 matchesnot enough data
MIchelle Jeram + Janine Kaganzev123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jodi Hathaway
187W–146L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
Sabrina Alban
17W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
MIchelle Jeram
22W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Bridgett Patterson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Jodie Phillips
110W–116L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Pamela Gowen
51W–88L career · 8 lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.08
Janine Kaganzev
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Linda McArthur
73W–81L career · 3 lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Barbara Tobler
62W–116L career · 4 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.94
Kimberly Price
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.88
Mary Beth Herrera
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.