Teams

N OR-Ko

2025 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Janet Ha
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Mihee Park
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.11
Mihye Ko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-07-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesYoungmin Byun / Mihee Park vs Paddy McShane / Hannah Riley1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-07-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesYoungmin Byun / Mihee Park vs Amory-Katelyn Zschach / Margaret Jacobsen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesMihee Park / Youngmin Byun vs Diana Kessler / Michelle Eastburn-Larsen6-3, 6-3
2025-07-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesMihye Ko / Janet Ha vs Cricket Forsey / Robyn Hilden6-4, 6-4
2025-06-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesMihee Park / Youngmin Byun vs Brenda Elliott / Janice Hazel6-2, 6-1
2025-06-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesJanet Ha / Mihye Ko vs Cynthia Novac-Yu / Liz Theeuws6-0, 6-2
2025-06-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesMihye Ko / Janet Ha vs Priscilla Paik / Heather Davidson6-4, 6-0
2025-06-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesMihye Ko / Janet Ha vs Christine Egan / Dianna Kaady6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Janet Ha
105W–56L career
1%99%0%
3.26
3
Mihee Park
147W–89L career
0%23%77%
3.20
3
Mihye Ko
98W–51L career
0%49%51%
3.11

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.