Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Gardner-WN/SA

2024 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#2 DoublesRebecca Berman / Sandra Zane vs Alicia Callanan / Amy Soong Tsai6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTerry Meng / May Low vs Christiana Liu / Diep Ho7-5, 6-2
2024-11-16vs SGV CA Rollers- Shimizu-WN/SUSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPam Barbato / Nancy Ray vs Christine Russell / Celeste Torres6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlice Markowski / Sandra Zane vs Margarita Frame / Natalie Nofsinger7-6, 6-4
2024-11-10vs SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SU2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKathleen Foy-Asaro / Shannon Koeppen vs Annemarie Schnedler / Ming-Ming Peng1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlice Markowski / Jo Ann Thrailkill vs Stacey Zhao / Florence Chen4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesPam Barbato / Shannon Koeppen vs Keiko Jun / Yasuko Seki6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlice Markowski / Sandra Zane vs Danette Stein / Lilly Shuton2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJo Ann Thrailkill / Kathleen Foy-Asaro vs Esther Hwang / Erin Newsome Moltz1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSophia Chang / Alice Markowski vs Antoinette Lessuk / Helle Hegelund4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Foy-Asaro / Jo Ann Thrailkill vs Nancy Wong-Thomas / Audrey Thomas3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlice Markowski / Pam Barbato vs Karen Willaman / Sarah Kloepfer6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesSandra Zane / Rebecca Berman vs Charlotte Pereira Reisch / Mara Watkins2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesPam Barbato / Joanna Gardner vs Jill Mastroluca / Kerri Munson3-6, 4-6
2024-09-28vs SGV Smashers Fall 24-Kagan-WN/SULost 01
L#2 DoublesMay Low / Terry Meng vs Kathleen Janisch / Keiko Kagan4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Nancy Ray
published
3.38
Shannon Koeppen
published
3.37
Jo Ann Thrailkill
published
3.31
Pam Barbato
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Leslie Jiang
published
3.22
Rebecca Berman
published
3.12
Joanna Gardner
published
3.09
Terry Meng
published
3.03
Sandra Zane
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.91
May Low
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Alice Markowski
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Sophia Chang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sophia Chang + May Low2451% games+0.7% vs expected
Leslie Jiang + Sandra Zane2446% games−3.0% vs expected
Sandra Zane + Pam Barbato2642% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Ray
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
Shannon Koeppen
29W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Jo Ann Thrailkill
34W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
3.5
Pam Barbato
100W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
172W–163L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Leslie Jiang
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
Rebecca Berman
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Joanna Gardner
29W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.12
Terry Meng
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.09
3.5
Sandra Zane
146W–141L career · 4 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
May Low
28W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Alice Markowski
70W–69L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Sophia Chang
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.