Teams

Contenders

2023 Tri-One Doubles League · 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.88 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-01vs Dos AmigosWon 10
W#1 DoublesDustin Crawford / David Pascua vs Raymond Bolanos / Matthew Inouye6-3, 6-2
2023-09-17vs Tennis Hall of FramersLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Uyemura / Dan Tabori vs Jason Soileau / Dustin Taguma4-6, 2-6
2023-09-10vs Game Set Match DrinksLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Pascua / Dan Tabori vs Alden Lum / Bryan Lum2-6, 2-6
2023-08-27vs KRC A TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesDustin Crawford / Adam Picker vs Ian Greene / Erik Burian6-1, 6-1
2023-08-20vs Dos AmigosWon 10
W#1 DoublesDustin Crawford / Adam Picker vs Raymond Bolanos / Matthew Inouye6-3, 6-3
2023-08-13vs Game Set Match DrinksLost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Shimizu / Daniel Uyemura vs Michael Okai / Alden Lum2-6, 3-6
2023-08-06vs Tennis Hall of FramersLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Pascua / Dan Tabori vs Jason Soileau / Dustin Taguma2-6, 3-6
2023-07-23vs KRC A TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Uyemura / Ken Shimizu vs Ian Greene / Scott Nishikawa6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Game Set Match Drinks7070013
2Tennis Hall of Framers5252664
3Contenders4444866
4Dos Amigos26261386
5KRC A Team17171478

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Dustin Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Adam Picker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Dan Tabori
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Ken Shimizu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Daniel Uyemura
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
David Pascua
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Pascua + Dustin Crawford6070% games+16.4% vs expected
Adam Picker + David Pascua3255% games+15.8% vs expected
Ken Shimizu + Daniel Uyemura5258% games+3.7% vs expected
Adam Picker + Dustin Crawford3260% gamesnot enough data
David Pascua + Dan Tabori044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dustin Crawford
50W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Adam Picker
45W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Dan Tabori
34W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
Ken Shimizu
26W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Daniel Uyemura
39W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
David Pascua
123W–125L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.