Teams

GOrr (Springfield)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-28vs JKarasek (Carmel)Split 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Hagar / Joy Furchner vs Crystal Allen / Kinzie Bashline6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesErica Turkus / Brooke Hopkins vs Jasmine Karasek / Kelli Narveson2-6, 2-6
2023-09-19vs TLaBrosse/JRafferty (Carmel)Won 20
W#1 DoublesTrena Thomas / Joy Furchner vs Brooke Cole / Paige Jones6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHeather Hagar / Jen Abernathy vs Nadia Meredith / Sarah Firquin6-0, 6-0
2023-09-14vs CRowe (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesErica Turkus / Joy Furchner vs Melissa Orr / Kirstin Martin6-3, 6-2
2023-08-31vs BGodfrey/JMiller (Firethorne)Won 20
W#1 DoublesErica Turkus / Anna Culver vs Renu Renu Gill / Jill Ytterstad7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJillene McGovern / Jen Abernathy vs Jenya Shulmanovich / Amber Tibb6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-24vs ADuncan (JATC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJen Abernathy / Christy ACEVEDO vs Lauren Moskowitz / Jen Mugnano6-1, 6-3
2023-08-17vs MWolf (WSRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesErica Turkus / Trena Thomas vs Laurie Madonna / Heather Burch6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrooke Hopkins / Joy Furchner vs Mary Wolf / Kelsey Gerber6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Joy Furchner
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Christy ACEVEDO
published 3.5
2.87
Erica Turkus
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Kayla Meyer
published
2.41
Jen Abernathy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.35
Lindsay Ford
published
Heather Hagar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jen Abernathy + Erica Turkus7258% gamesnot enough data
Joy Furchner + Erica Turkus6166% gamesnot enough data
Heather Hagar + Jen Abernathy224 matchesnot enough data
Joy Furchner + Jen Abernathy033 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Ford + Kayla Meyer213 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Ford + Jen Abernathy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Joy Furchner
67W–39L career · 8 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Christy ACEVEDO
63W–38L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.10
3
Erica Turkus
74W–86L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
Kayla Meyer
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.51
3
Jen Abernathy
29W–37L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.41
Lindsay Ford
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
2.35
Heather Hagar
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.