Teams

Richardson - RS Clay

2025 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-17vs Foster - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesKyle Ehlers / Jeff Crigler vs Josh Sitton / Daniel Herman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-07-09vs Foster - RS ClayLost 12
L#1 SinglesKyle Ehlers vs Dana Foster5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCosme Barrios / Trip Carter vs Christopher Brown / Rudy Seelmann0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrian Jordan / Mario Stramaglia vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-18vs Foster - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesKyle Ehlers / Brian Jordan vs Rudy Seelmann / Charlie Skelton6-4, 6-1
2025-06-04Won 20
W#1 SinglesBrian Jordan vs Trey Whittaker7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeff Crigler / Cosme Barrios vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-28Split 11
L#1 DoublesStephen Baes / Cosme Barrios vs Trey Whittaker / Steven King2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKyle Ehlers / Brian Jordan vs Mansfield Coe / Chad Cage3-0
2025-05-21vs Foster - RS ClaySplit 11
W#2 DoublesBrian Jordan / Kyle Ehlers vs Steven King / Will Spencer6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesStephen Baes / Jeff Crigler vs Chad Cage / Christopher Brown7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-14vs Foster - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesKyle Ehlers / Brian Jordan vs Christopher Brown / Rudy Seelmann6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCosme Barrios / Stephen Baes vs Daniel Herman / Chad Cage6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Stephen Baes
published
4.31
Brian Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.17
Brad Bradford
published 4.5
4.13
4.13
Cosme Barrios
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.12
Mario Stramaglia
published
4.11
Kyle Ehlers
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.10
Paul Einhart
published
3.78
Jeff Crigler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stephen Burgess
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Jordan + Kyle Ehlers12267% games+3.7% vs expected
Michael Richardson Jr + Paul Einhart224 matchesnot enough data
Cosme Barrios + Jeff Crigler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Baes
16W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
4.48
4.5
Brian Jordan
99W–25L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
4.31
4.5
Brad Bradford
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Michael Richardson Jr
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Cosme Barrios
59W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
Mario Stramaglia
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
4.12
Kyle Ehlers
40W–18L career · 10 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
Paul Einhart
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
Jeff Crigler
29W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.78
Stephen Burgess
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.