Teams

CCV Reifsnider-

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.56 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-12vs Wyndham-EccardLost 01
L#2 SinglesKirsti Goodwin vs Anna Gibellato2-6, 1-6
2025-06-09vs TDC SpillareWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Carr / Kirsti Goodwin vs Nathalie Stephens / Alison Spelbring6-0, 6-1
2025-05-30vs SCC Nobles/ConsolvoWon 32
L#1 DoublesLia Mooney / Shula Good vs Carla Shaffer / Donna Jamison4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMary Desch vs Beth Phipps6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Taylor Schaaf / Kim Cressy vs Susan Gregory / Sally Hurt6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJennifer Levy vs Becky McNeer4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCharlotte Clarkson / Elizabeth Carr vs Tracy Diel / Heather Joyce6-1, 6-3
2025-05-14vs KRA- Fleck/WalekLost 01
L#2 DoublesKirsti Goodwin / Elizabeth Carr vs Katherine Fleck / Sara Winterhoff6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Christina Bier
published 4
3.63
3.63
Emily Gottwald
published 3.5
3.56
Elizabeth Carr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Anne Taylor Schaaf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Berkeley McQuiddy
published 3.5
3.29
Laura Baird
published
3.26
Mary Desch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Alston Daigh
published 3.5
Charlotte Clarkson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Lia Mooney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Shula Good
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Kirsti Goodwin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jennifer Levy
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Kim Cressy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Reifsnider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lia Mooney + Elizabeth Carr303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Bier
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
3.5
Cary Campbell-Knight
17W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Emily Gottwald
19W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Elizabeth Carr
43W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Anne Taylor Schaaf
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Berkeley McQuiddy
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Laura Baird
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
Mary Desch
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Alston Daigh
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Charlotte Clarkson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lia Mooney
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Shula Good
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.17
Kirsti Goodwin
56W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Jennifer Levy
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kim Cressy
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robin Reifsnider
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.