Teams

Hall/Sampson

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Winter Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-24vs Wise AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeigh Leslie / Karen Rabin vs Cara Hur / Rhonda Condron6-0, 6-4
2023-02-24vs Manor 3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeigh Leslie / Nancy Davis vs Laura Davis / Karen Parker6-2, 6-4
2023-02-01vs Norbeck NettersLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Rabin / Leigh Leslie vs Emily Browning / Lucy Sullivan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-20vs Manor 3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesKathryn Sampson / Leigh Leslie vs KAREN WALKER / Kathryn Lloyd6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Nancy Davis
published
2.76
2.74
Karen Rabin
published
2.72
Leigh Leslie
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Helen Mahoney
published 3
2.69
Chung Kim
published 3
2.57
Kathryn Sampson
published
2.46
Marjorie Guroff
published
Janet Lasken
published
Loistene Lassiter
published
Ursulla McLeod
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Jenkins-Woodard + Marjorie Guroff033 matchesnot enough data
Chung Kim + Nancy Davis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Davis
16W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
2.84
Renee Jenkins-Woodard
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.76
Karen Rabin
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Leigh Leslie
109W–138L career · 8 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Helen Mahoney
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Chung Kim
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Kathryn Sampson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
2.57
Marjorie Guroff
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46
Janet Lasken
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Loistene Lassiter
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ursulla McLeod
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.