Teams

EVTA/Kimsey Kendrick

2025 EVTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Early Spring · Ladies 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-16vs Shook/DellingerWon 21
L#1 DoublesLiz Mathis / Kim Adams vs Lori Shook / Kimberly Brown3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRebekah Waller vs Kristin Bowie7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKimsey Kendrick / Neeve Owen vs Christi Cronin / Michelle Gambill6-0, 6-4
2025-04-09vs Shook/DellingerWon 20
W#1 DoublesStacy Sorrow / Bettina Briggs vs Jewel Akpose / Michelle Gambill6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRebekah Waller vs Tara McFarlane6-4, 6-1
2025-04-02vs Shook/DellingerWon 31
W#1 DoublesTammy Kilgore / Suni Carroll vs Lori Shook / Christi Cronin6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKelly Roberts vs Kristin Bowie3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Hayes / Lawanna Chang vs Jill Robinson / Shelly Bell6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLiz Mathis / Kim Adams vs Tara McFarlane / Kimberly Brown6-4, 6-1
2025-03-26vs Shook/DellingerWon 40
W#1 DoublesMargie Patton / Mary Kang vs Terina Fowler / Jewel Akpose6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRebekah Waller vs Tara McFarlane6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStacy Sorrow / Lawanna Chang vs Lori Shook / Joy Suskind6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBettina Briggs / Tracy Smith vs Kimberly Brown / Michelle Gambill6-2, 6-2
2025-03-19vs Shook/DellingerWon 31
W#1 DoublesTammy Kilgore / Tracy Smith vs Christi Cronin / Kimberly Brown6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMary Kang vs Kristin Bowie3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Hayes / Neeve Owen vs Jill Robinson / Shelly Bell6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKim Adams / Kimsey Kendrick vs Jewel Akpose / Tara McFarlane6-1, 6-2
2025-03-12vs Shook/DellingerWon 40
W#1 DoublesLiz Mathis / Neeve Owen vs Shelly Bell / Jill Robinson6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRebekah Waller vs Jewel Akpose7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelly Roberts / Margie Patton vs Christi Cronin / Michelle Gambill6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSuni Carroll / Kimsey Kendrick vs Terina Fowler / Lori Shook7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Mary Kang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.77
Tammy Kilgore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Bettina Briggs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Neeve Owen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Rebekah Waller
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.66
Stacy Sorrow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Suni Carroll
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Margie Patton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Lawanna Chang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Kim Adams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Liz Mathis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Kelly Roberts
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Kimsey Kendrick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neeve Owen + Kelly Roberts7257% games+14.1% vs expected
Margie Patton + Neeve Owen5160% games+7.4% vs expected
Stacy Sorrow + Lawanna Chang13164% games+3.6% vs expected
Kelly Roberts + Kim Adams4252% games−0.0% vs expected
Margie Patton + Kelly Roberts5067% gamesnot enough data
Suni Carroll + Kimsey Kendrick404 matchesnot enough data
Neeve Owen + Liz Mathis404 matchesnot enough data
Liz Mathis + Kim Adams224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Kang
40W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Tammy Kilgore
29W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Bettina Briggs
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Neeve Owen
46W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.69
Rebekah Waller
18W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Stacy Sorrow
42W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Suni Carroll
26W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.65
Margie Patton
19W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Lawanna Chang
39W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Kim Adams
17W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Liz Mathis
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Kelly Roberts
38W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Kimsey Kendrick
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.