Teams

WNCG Anderson (HRC)

Adult 65 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 65+ Adult Women 3.0 Tues

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-21vs WNCE Liddy (HRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesGay Anderson / Heather North vs Elaine Liddy / Barbara Weinland3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Carson / Sheri Sparks vs Claudia Gavin / Jane Miller1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDebra Highsmith / Suzanne Tully vs Patricia McClurkin / Margaret Peggy Sanders6-1, 7-5
2026-04-17vs WNCE Liddy (HRC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Phan / Sheri Sparks vs JoAnne Dougher / Margaret Peggy Sanders6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLoretta Arrington / Heather North vs Claudia Gavin / Barbara Weinland7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDebra Highsmith / Anna Kemper vs Kathryn Overstreet / Marlene Rau6-4, 6-2
2026-04-03vs WNCE Liddy (HRC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesLoretta Arrington / Christina Phan vs Jane Miller / Kathryn Overstreet2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeather North / Anna Kemper vs JoAnne Dougher / Patricia McClurkin6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLiz Carson / Suzanne Tully vs Margaret Peggy Sanders / Sammie Vittoria6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65+ Adult Women 3.0 Tues have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Heather North
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Gay Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Sheri Sparks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Christina Phan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Anna Kemper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Debra Highsmith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Loretta Arrington
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Holly Roe
published
Suzanne Tully
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gay Anderson + Heather North5456% games+5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather North
15W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Gay Anderson
17W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.90
Sheri Sparks
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Christina Phan
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Anna Kemper
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Debra Highsmith
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.77
Loretta Arrington
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Holly Roe
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzanne Tully
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.