Teams

NMAC.Friedman

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.79 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-29vs MD.EnglertWon 21
W#1 DoublesInes Murman / Brittany Rook vs Kelly Shields / Jessica Bennett6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngela Peach / Sarah Ellis vs Mary Ashley Hill / Deanna Hart3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlejandra Monsalve / Melissa Allard vs Rochelle Roth / Dana Wills6-4, 6-4
2026-08-22vs TOC.AroraLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessica May / Brittany Friedman vs Lisa Hitesman / Fang Cai6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesClaudia Bownes / Brittany Rook vs Stacey Mantooth / Nicola Steffen4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Allard / Lauren Leach vs Jamie Chuu / Ella Prince2-6, 0-6
2026-08-01vs MCP.ZhangWon 21
W#1 DoublesTheresa Crone / Alejandra Monsalve vs Xinwen Zhang / Jiayi Zhou6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBrittany Friedman / Ines Murman vs Stacia Zhong - * / Xian Zhang - *6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelissa Allard / Sarah Ellis vs Dongbo Lu / Xinghong Tang7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Ines Murman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Claudia Bownes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Theresa Crone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Melissa Allard
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.52
Angela Peach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Alejandra Monsalve
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.23
Brittany Friedman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.22
Lauren Leach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Brittany Rook
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Crone + Ines Murman2543% games−7.2% vs expected
Brittany Friedman + Ines Murman123 matchesnot enough data
Brittany Friedman + Alejandra Monsalve123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ines Murman
30W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Claudia Bownes
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Theresa Crone
36W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
Melissa Allard
6W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Angela Peach
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Alejandra Monsalve
32W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.40
2.5
Brittany Friedman
10W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Lauren Leach
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Brittany Rook
7W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.