Teams

MEccleston/LBaddigam (Life Time)

2023 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-15vs TWalker (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesToni Escuder / Erin Clapham vs Amy Yancey / Jennifer Harrison6-0, 6-0
2023-09-08vs KHeidkamp (PCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesToni Escuder / Alexis Galbreath vs Kate Schumacher / Brandi Marks7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-09-01Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRaquel Correa / Erin Clapham vs Michelle Winterich / Diane Smith0-6, 6-7
2023-08-25vs EConklin/AIannuzzi (Carmel)Won 20
W#1 DoublesErin Clapham / Kristy Simmons vs Kathryn Klaus / Beth Hahn3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesToni Escuder / Latha Baddigam vs Sara Porrata / Carrie Carickhoff6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Latha Baddigam
published 3.5
3.46
Melissa Eccleston
published 3.5
3.33
Erin Clapham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Julie Linder
published
3.27
Toni Escuder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Kimberly Warpula
published
3.14
Kristy Simmons
published
3.08
Jennifer McNally
published
3.05
Raquel Correa
published
3.03
Alexis Galbreath
published 3.5
2.92
Lesly Carlton
published
2.83
Laura Difraia
published
2.71
Jennifer McCoy
published
2.57
Debra Holland
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer McNally + Melissa Eccleston4650% games+11.4% vs expected
Melissa Eccleston + Latha Baddigam7359% gamesnot enough data
Toni Escuder + Erin Clapham4166% gamesnot enough data
Raquel Correa + Julie Linder314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Latha Baddigam
63W–41L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Melissa Eccleston
37W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Erin Clapham
93W–84L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Julie Linder
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Toni Escuder
66W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Kimberly Warpula
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Kristy Simmons
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
Jennifer McNally
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.08
Raquel Correa
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Alexis Galbreath
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Lesly Carlton
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.92
Laura Difraia
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
2.83
Jennifer McCoy
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Debra Holland
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.