Teams

SD 3.0 CTC (3:1)/ Holzer

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD WD · SD - Women - 3.0 WD

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-24vs SD 3.0 Peninsula TC (2:2)/ MortonLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmy Holzer vs Lara McFarlin2-6, 4-6
2025-03-10vs SD 3.0 Peninsula TC (3:1)/ EvansLost 01
L#1 DoublesKarin Copp / Amy Holzer vs Malinda Marsh / KATHRYN RHODES4-6, 6-7
2025-02-24vs SD WD LLW 3.0 Mtn View/ StanleyLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Holzer / Rebecca King vs Angela Cortez / Nuri Velasco Andrade3-6, 6-7
2025-02-10vs SD 3.0 CTC (3:1)/ HackworthLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Holzer / Jill Russell vs Leslie Vineyard / Susan Dussault2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-03vs SD 3.0 Mtn View(3:1)/ BravoLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Holzer / Amy Minicilli vs Denisse Fax / Georgette Moreira3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesKarin Copp / Amy Minicilli vs Kristi Gottlieb / Claudia Garcia6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLisa Givens vs Sofia Zepeda-Carranza5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRebecca King / Tanya Strong vs Tatiana Sotres / Laura Vargas6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesClaudia Nelson / Jill Russell vs Carla Herrera / Daniela Urrea Salmon6-0, 6-1
2025-01-13vs SD 3.0 CTC (2:2)/ Anderson- TBDWon 10
W#2 DoublesKarin Copp / Amy Holzer vs Margaret Pettit / Lainie Reuter6-1, 6-3
2025-01-06vs SD 3.0 SDT&RC(3:1)/ SwirhunLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Holzer / Claudia Nelson vs Julia Haims / Denise le Feuvre3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJill Russell / Heidi Nevitt vs Nancy Swirhun / Natalie Anderson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Brittney Emerson
published 3
2.94
Karin Copp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Amy Holzer
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.77
Claudia Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Amy Minicilli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Tanya Strong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Laura Stacy
published
2.63
Lisa Givens
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.46
Heidi Nevitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Holzer + Karin Copp3251% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brittney Emerson
26W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
Karin Copp
11W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Amy Holzer
80W–104L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Claudia Nelson
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Amy Minicilli
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Tanya Strong
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Laura Stacy
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Lisa Givens
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63
3
Heidi Nevitt
7W–11L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.